Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

New LA Unified superintendent signs $350,000 contract

(
LAUSD
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Listen 0:56
New LA Unified superintendent signs $350,000 contract

New L.A. Unified superintendent Michelle King made her appointment official on Tuesday when she signed a nearly two-and-a-half year contract offered by the school board.

“Ms. King, with this pen, I thee contract,” said school board president Steve Zimmer in the school board chambers after the board emerged from a closed-door session.

The new superintendent’s $350,000 salary is $50,000 more than what predecessor Ramon Cortines was paid, and it's roughly $47,000 more than her salary as chief deputy superintendent of schools.

The nine-page contract provides King with a school district car and driver, and security if necessary. Outside consulting or employment must be approved by the school board.

The contract also includes the board’s ambitious goals for the new superintendent, asking for her to bring the district to a perfect performance that no urban district in the country has achieved.

It asks King to lift the district's graduation rate to 100 percent – 30 percentage points higher than the current rate. The board also wants her to achieve 100 percent attendance, proficiency for all students, and engagement of parents and families.

Such performance goals were not in Cortines’ contract, but they were included in his predecessor John Deasy’s contract. Deasy’s contract included three specific, more incremental goals for him to meet and the promise of incentive pay if he met the goals. For example, Deasy would have been paid an additional $10,000 for each eight percentage point increase in the graduation rate. King’s contract does not go into this level of detail or offer incentive pay.

Sponsored message

The contract doesn’t prescribe consequences if the superintendent doesn’t meet the broad goals, nor does it require the board to conduct a formal evaluation of King. However, the contract does schedule her first performance review for October.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right