Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Navy failed to consider dolphin protections, court rules

It is hoped the bottlenose dolphin trapped in Boca Chica wetlands will once again leap upon the waves, as this one is doing.
A bottlenose dolphin surfaces from the ocean.
(
Wikimedia
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

A ruling out of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals says a lower court should not have dismissed a challenge of the Navy's use of sonar around dolphins. 

Sonar uses pulses of sound under water to detect submarines. The noises can interfere with dolphins' hearing and behavior.

The Natural Resources Defense Council and other environmental groups sued the U.S. Navy and the National Marine Fisheries Service over its 2012 permit to use sonar. That permit allowed the Navy's use of sonar to harm or even kill some marine mammals, as long as it was a number small enough to be called an "incidental take" and would have a negligible effect on the species.

A three-judge appeals court panel ruling said the permit should have more fully considered the harm sonar could have done to the dolphins and provided steps to reduce the harm, action that is required under the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act.
 
The act doesn't ban all peacetime activities that could harm or kill dolphins and other sea mammals. But it requires that any harm be minimal.
 
The appeals court ruling revives the NRDC case against the government agencies and it goes back to the lower court for further litigation.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today