Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

A year after scathing report, effects of foster care reforms still murky

Social worker Alfred McCloud knocks on the front door of a home in south L.A. to check on a toddler. McCloud works the night shift with the Department of Child and Family Services' Emergency Response Team.
Social worker Alfred McCloud knocks on the front door of a home in south L.A. to check on a toddler. McCloud works the night shift with the Department of Child and Family Services' Emergency Response Team.
(
Grant Slater/KPCC
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

A year after a Blue Ribbon panel declared a "state of emergency" in Los Angeles's child welfare system and proposed dozens of reforms, the county has made a handful of changes but the effects are still an open question.

Among the changes the county has implemented:

  • It's increased stipends for relatives who take in foster kids, which the research shows, is often the best placement.
  • It's near the point of sending nurses along with social workers to help investigate abuse claims.
  • It's established a new Office of Child Protection to coordinate the myriad agencies that have an impact on child safety.

"The classic challenge is how do you measure something that hasn't happened" - like preventing abuse and neglect - said Emily Putnam-Hornstein, an assistant professor of social work at USC and director of the Children's Data Network. "We have federal measures, we have state measures, but they're really focused on what happens to kids and families once that first report to the child protection system has occurred."

L.A. County measures up pretty well compared to other child welfare agencies in California by some metrics.

Sponsored message

For instance, the county beats the average in the number of infants who are the subject of calls for abuse after social workers determine they can remain at home after an initial report. Statewide, 60 percent of those who remained at home had a new abuse allegation within 5 years. In Los Angeles, it was 55 percent. 

But the reasons are unclear, Putnam-Hornstein said.

It could be because social workers here leave fewer infants in the care of their biological parents to begin with. Or it could be that L.A. County has better services than elsewhere. Or it could be that the population in L.A. County is less demographically risky. 

"Even just this one measure of performance is not easy to interpret," Putnam-Hornstein said.

The blue ribbon panel was created after an 8-year-old boy, Gabriel Fernandez, was brutally killed by his mother and her boyfriend. Prior to his death, multiple people had reported suspicion of abuse in his home, and social workers had even visited the family, but no action had been taken.

The commission found that Fernandez's death was a particularly gruesome example of longstanding systemic problems inside the department, which is tasked with preventing child abuse, investigating allegations and helping kids once they're in the system.

The commission's recommended reforms were diverse, from the small and programmatic, to the sweeping. Leslie Gilbert-Lurie, who vice-chaired the group, said a lot of the recommendations were not new.

Sponsored message

"Many good, sound recommendations that had kept children safer had been made over the years," she said. "The recommendations were never implemented."

She credits the progress made in the past year to support from the Board of Supervisors. Still, many recommendations have not yet be implemented.

And measuring how well a county is doing at keeping kids safe, is relatively uncharted territory, Putnam-Hornstein said.

"There is correctly an urgency to this work, but there's also a desire to see impact right away" because the stakes are so high, she said. "There will need to be some metrics that can measure that, in my mind."

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right