Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

McCourt divorce trial: Frank's turn at bat

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:59
McCourt divorce trial: Frank's turn at bat
McCourt divorce trial: Frank's turn at bat

Frank McCourt took the stand today in Los Angeles in the divorce trial that could decide who owns the Dodgers.

McCourt didn't take the witness stand until late in the afternoon and only for a few minutes. He told Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Scott Gordon that it was his soon-to-be-ex-wife Jamie’s idea to order up a post-nuptial marital agreement that would protect her assets from his creditors.

McCourt insists the agreement gives him sole control of the Dodgers; Jamie McCourt wants the judge to rule that they should split the Dodgers evenly as community property.

Earlier in the day, attorney Leah Bishop testified about her efforts to get the McCourts to take care of important legal paperwork. Bishop’s expertise is in estate planning. She did what estate planners do: she drafted a living trust intended to keep the McCourts’ assets out of probate if something happened to Frank or Jamie.

Sponsored message

The living trust would have made all the McCourts' assets community property. But Bishop said Frank wouldn’t sign and the couple wouldn’t sit down to work out their differences. She said they bickered all the time. Bishop quit representing the McCourts a year ago.

The McCourts' dispute over who owns the Dodgers hinges on a post-nuptial agreement both signed six years ago, not long after they took over the ballclub.

The couple signed six copies of a deal to divvy up property, but they didn’t sign them together. Some copies say Frank is the sole owner; some say Jamie has an interest in the team. Judge Gordon will decide which documents are correct.

On Monday, Jamie McCourt’s attorney Dennis Wasser told the judge his client never intended to give up her interest in the team. “It doesn’t make sense,” he said.

Frank McCourt’s attorney Stephen Susman said Jamie didn’t want to share the risks of owning a baseball team, so she proposed an agreement that kept several homes in her name in case creditors went after Frank.

When court reconvenes Wednesday, Frank resumes his testimony. The trial will last 11 days, but not in a row. Judge Gordon will hear testimony this week, then courtroom scheduling requires a two-week break.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right