Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

Malibu City Council gets an earful as residents react to chain store decision

File photo. On Nov. 3, L.A. County voters will decide the fate of 10 ballot measures.
FILE: Voters in Malibu thought that approving a measure to limit retail stores would help maintain the character of the beach town, but a judge recently overturned the measure.
(
JOE KLAMAR/AFP/Getty Images
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:46
Malibu City Council gets an earful as residents react to chain store decision

Malibu voters, who thought they’d blocked a large retail project to maintain the character of the famous beach town only to have their vote overturned in court, got their first chance to discuss the decision before the City Council Monday night.

About 15 local residents spoke during a public comment period that followed a review of the December Los Angeles Superior Court decision that overturned the voters' will on a planned shopping center anchored by a Whole Foods store.

At issue are two ballot measures: Measure R placed citywide restrictions on retail stores, such as requiring voters to approve plans for commercial projects over 20,000 square feet. That measure passed handily in November 2014 and was followed in November 2015 by Measure W, which failed to pass and so blocked the large commercial shopping center.

But L.A. Superior Court Judge James Chalfant's decision last month set aside the votes, essentially paving the way now for the shopping center to be built. 

Sponsored message

On Monday night, council members heard from residents. Several said they felt deceived by a system that negated their votes to limit chain stores in Malibu. 

"I think it’s our duty to try and follow what the residents wanted and they overwhelmingly wanted this,” said Michael Osterman, a business owner and 30-year resident of Malibu, in urging the council to appeal the court decision.

On the other hand, Malibu resident Justine Peretti echoed a sentiment also shared during the meeting: concerns about the cost to pursue further legal action while issues like homelessness and school improvements need addressing.

“I would hate to see any more money spent on this,” she said. “I think it would be a total waste.”

Some suggested if an appeal goes forward, it should be Rob Reiner who pays for it. The actor was a major supporter of Measure R to stop the development.

Steve Soboroff, the developer behind the project and former vice chairman of the Los Angeles Dodgers, was unavailable for an interview, according to his representative.

Malibu Mayor Laura Zahn Ronsenthal has been hearing from many residents since the judge’s decision. Voters have been approaching her at the gym and grocery store, she said.

Sponsored message

"I think that’s important to listen to the will of the voters," she said. "But if something is unconstitutional we can’t do it."

City Attorney Christi Hogin said council members should consider several issues when deciding whether to appeal the court decision. For one, she said, there may be ways to solve the problem through legislation without appealing. Additionally, she cautioned that an appeal could ultimately make things worse and create further openings for development since there aren't a lot of decisions published on similar issues. 

The final judgment is expected by Jan. 28. Hogin said the city then has 60 days to decide whether to appeal. 

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right