Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Los Angeles moves to ban alcohol ads on buses, city property

The L.A. City Council voted Tuesday to ban ads for alcoholic beverages on city-owned or city-controlled property, including buses like the one pictured here.
The L.A. City Council voted Tuesday to ban ads for alcoholic beverages on city-owned or city-controlled property, including buses like the one pictured here.
(
Stock photo by Chris(hercwad)/Flickr Creative Commons
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Los Angeles' City Council has voted to ban alcohol ads on property controlled or owned by the city, including buses and other vehicles. 

The unanimous vote came Tuesday morning and expanded on previous efforts to curb such advertising in public spaces.

According to CBSLA.com, the council voted last June to ban alcohol ads in any future Bureau of Street Services contracts for bus shelters and other projects.

Alcohol-related ads make up about 20 percent of the space offered on city property in five council districts, CBS reports.

According to the Associated Press, Councilman Paul Koretz said the ban is a good place for the city to step in and prevent those ads from potentially influencing students, who supporters say can face a barrage of images that glamorize drinking while on their way to classes.

The current prohibition would apply only to new advertising contracts and would exempt any properties that operate restaurants or serve as venues for concerts and other events and are permitted to sell alcohol.

According to AP, similar ad prohibitions exist in San Francisco and Philadelphia.

Sponsored message

Mayor Eric Garcetti still has to approve the ordinance before it becomes law.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right