Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Live next to an oil well? CARB wants to know what's in your air
Listen
• 0:58
An oil well next to a home in the Wilmington neighborhood of Los Angeles, California on November 6, 2017.
(
Emily Guerin/KPCC
)
The California Air Resources Board is starting a new air monitoring program to find out what people who live near oil and gas wells are breathing.
The agency says it is responding to years of complaints from people living alongside oil development, as well as the realization, heightened by the Aliso Canyon gas leak, that California’s oil and gas infrastructure is aging.
Beginning next year, CARB plans to place trailer-size air monitors in several California neighborhoods for up to four months at a time and measure toxic emissions, smog-forming pollution and greenhouse gasses. The agency will select the communities based on local air agency input, resident concerns, and existing air data showing hotspots for oil and gas emissions.
The goal is to figure out what chemicals oil and gas operations are emitting and what impact, if any, they have on public health.
Support for LAist comes from
The new program comes at a time when California is increasingly scrutinizing and collecting emissions data on refineries and other industrial polluters. AB 617, passed during the last legislative session and signed by Gov. Brown, also requires CARB to create air monitoring programs for communities with disproportionate pollution burdens.
Environmental justice activists praised the efforts to gather more data, but some were skeptical that they would actually lead to healthier air for people living in so-called “fence-line” communities.
“We know these emissions are dangerous to health. We know they also drive climate change,” said Martha Dina Argüello, director of Physicians for Social Responsibility in Los Angeles. “How much data do we need to act?”
But Elizabeth Scheehle, the branch chief of CARB’s oil and has division, promised the data would not just sit on a shelf.
“We want to make sure we understand what’s going on in these communities, and that if there is a problem, we follow up in the appropriate way to address that problem," she said.
Many environmental justice groups say the most appropriate way to address urban oil and gas development is to phase it out.
“That’s the only way we’re going to address climate change, clean up the smog, and prevent exposure to cancer-causing chemicals,” said Julia May, a staff scientist for Communities for a Better Environment. “In the mean time it’s very encouraging that we have better monitoring technologies, but it shouldn’t be considered the only goal.”
Support for LAist comes from
The City of Los Angeles is currently studying the feasibility of phasing out oil and gas development. In June, the city council directed the city’s petroleum administrator to study the public health benefits and economic costs of creating a buffer zone around schools, homes, and other public places where no oil extraction would be allowed. If the buffer is 2,500 feet, like activists are requesting, it would cause 90 percent of the city’s 322 active oil wells to shut down, according to an estimate by the California Department of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources.
CARB expects to decide which communities to monitor early next year and begin the program within the next six months.
This story is part of Elemental: Covering Sustainability, a new multimedia collaboration between Cronkite News, Arizona PBS, KJZZ, KPCC, Rocky Mountain PBS and PBS SoCal.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs. -
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
Best of LAist