With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Live next to an oil well? CARB wants to know what's in your air
Listen
• 0:58
An oil well next to a home in the Wilmington neighborhood of Los Angeles, California on November 6, 2017.
(
Emily Guerin/KPCC
)
The California Air Resources Board is starting a new air monitoring program to find out what people who live near oil and gas wells are breathing.
The agency says it is responding to years of complaints from people living alongside oil development, as well as the realization, heightened by the Aliso Canyon gas leak, that California’s oil and gas infrastructure is aging.
Beginning next year, CARB plans to place trailer-size air monitors in several California neighborhoods for up to four months at a time and measure toxic emissions, smog-forming pollution and greenhouse gasses. The agency will select the communities based on local air agency input, resident concerns, and existing air data showing hotspots for oil and gas emissions.
The goal is to figure out what chemicals oil and gas operations are emitting and what impact, if any, they have on public health.
Support for LAist comes from
The new program comes at a time when California is increasingly scrutinizing and collecting emissions data on refineries and other industrial polluters. AB 617, passed during the last legislative session and signed by Gov. Brown, also requires CARB to create air monitoring programs for communities with disproportionate pollution burdens.
Environmental justice activists praised the efforts to gather more data, but some were skeptical that they would actually lead to healthier air for people living in so-called “fence-line” communities.
“We know these emissions are dangerous to health. We know they also drive climate change,” said Martha Dina Argüello, director of Physicians for Social Responsibility in Los Angeles. “How much data do we need to act?”
But Elizabeth Scheehle, the branch chief of CARB’s oil and has division, promised the data would not just sit on a shelf.
“We want to make sure we understand what’s going on in these communities, and that if there is a problem, we follow up in the appropriate way to address that problem," she said.
Many environmental justice groups say the most appropriate way to address urban oil and gas development is to phase it out.
“That’s the only way we’re going to address climate change, clean up the smog, and prevent exposure to cancer-causing chemicals,” said Julia May, a staff scientist for Communities for a Better Environment. “In the mean time it’s very encouraging that we have better monitoring technologies, but it shouldn’t be considered the only goal.”
Support for LAist comes from
The City of Los Angeles is currently studying the feasibility of phasing out oil and gas development. In June, the city council directed the city’s petroleum administrator to study the public health benefits and economic costs of creating a buffer zone around schools, homes, and other public places where no oil extraction would be allowed. If the buffer is 2,500 feet, like activists are requesting, it would cause 90 percent of the city’s 322 active oil wells to shut down, according to an estimate by the California Department of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources.
CARB expects to decide which communities to monitor early next year and begin the program within the next six months.
This story is part of Elemental: Covering Sustainability, a new multimedia collaboration between Cronkite News, Arizona PBS, KJZZ, KPCC, Rocky Mountain PBS and PBS SoCal.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Immigration raids have caused some U.S. citizens to carry their passports to the store, to school or to work. But what documents to have on you depends on your citizenship. -
The historic properties have been sitting vacant for decades and were put on the market as-is, with prices ranging from $750,000 to $1.75 million. -
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high.
Best of LAist