Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

LAUSD teachers ratify deal on performance evaluation

UTLA President Warren Fletcher
UTLA President Warren Fletcher
(
Grant Slater/KPCC
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Los Angeles Unified School District teachers have approved a comprehensive evaluation system that would include test data, plus other measurements of student achievement, to determine their effectiveness in the classroom.

Of the nearly 17,000 who voted, 66 percent cast "yes'' ballots in favor of the agreement, which calls for teacher evaluations to be based on raw data from the California Standards Test along with district assessments, high school exit exams, attendance, graduation rates, suspensions and course completion.

The final tally was 11,185 in favor with 5,707 voting against the plan, according to results released Saturday.

Officials with United Teachers of Los Angeles, the union that represents the district's teachers, consider the vote a victory over earlier proposals and some nationwide efforts calling for heavier reliance on so-called value-added test scores.

"I'm gratified our members ratified the agreement that clearly states individual AGT (Academic Growth Over Time) scores will not be used as part of a teacher's final evaluation,'' UTLA President Warren Fletcher said in a statement. "We worked hard at the bargaining table to craft a system that intelligently uses student data in the evaluation of teachers.''

Los Angeles Schools Superintendent John Deasy also expressed relief the evaluation issue had been resolved.

"It's a sign that members really want us to begin moving forward with a more improved way around evaluations,'' Deasy told the Los Angeles Times.

Sponsored message

The agreement was the result of court-ordered bargaining as part of a lawsuit known as Doe vs Deasy. If teachers had rejected the agreement, the judge could have mandated value-added scores be used to evaluate teachers, the statement said.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant had ruled earlier that the Los Angeles district was violating state law by not using test scores as a factor in teacher evaluations.

National education advocate Diane Ravitch, a former assistant secretary of education, hailed the agreement in a statement released by UTLA.

The agreement "assures that test scores will not be over used, will not be assigned an arbitrary and inappropriate weight, will not be the sole or primary determinant of a teacher's evaluation, '' said Ravitch.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today