Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA’s attempt to ban pot shops takes a hit — dispensaries, patients sue to stop ban
Before the Los Angeles City Council's unanimous vote last month in favor of the ordinance to ban medical marijuana dispensaries, Police Chief Charlie Beck assured council members that shutting down the nearly 1,000 pot shops in the city would be a smooth operation.
Beck told the Coucil that it was his belief that "the vast majority of these establishments will willingly comply.”
Compliance seemed a long way off Friday.
The Patient Care Alliance, which represents 300 pot shops, is suing the city to stop the ban that's due to take effect on Sept. 6. The suit argues that California laws that allow access to medical marijuana preempt any city prohibition on pot shops.
The suit also takes issue with a provision in the city's new ordinance governing medical marijuana that allows groups of up to three patients to grow and share marijuana. When Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa signed the ordinance, he said the provision was the best option to preserve access for medical use and to protect public safety.
But Alliance attorney Marc O’Hara told a news conference outside a downtown courthouse that allowing only small groups of people to grow pot together is impractical and violates California’s Compassionate Use Act.
“There may be a misconception among people, maybe from the ‘60s, that you throw marijuana seeds in the backyard and then there’s all the marijuana," said O'Hata. "I think there’s a big difference between medical cannabis and backyard homegrown weed."
The suit also argues that a ban on medical marijuana dispensaries violates patients’ constitutional right to free association.
“Our contention is that the city is unable to legally deprive citizens of the right to assemble and associate together in connection with their diseases," said O'Hara.
But Loyola Law School professor Aaron Caplan said that argument may be a hard sell.
“The First Amendment recognizes a right to associate with other people in order to express ideas," said Caplan. "It doesn’t cover associating with other people in order to simply do things.”
O’Hara said he doesn’t expect to be able to stop implementation of L.A.'s pot shop ban, which takes effect in two weeks.
The lawsuit asks for a temporary restraining order, but that would require proving that the ban would cause immediate, serious and irreparable injury. That could be a difficult argument, given that the city intends to initially seek voluntary compliance from shop owners.
A spokesman for L.A. City Attorney Carmen Trutanich declined to comment on the suit because the office had not received a copy. Mayor Villaraigosa’s office also declined to comment.
But L.A. City Councilman José Huizar issued a statement expressing confidence that the city's new ordinance would survive the Patient Care Alliance's legal challenge. Echoing Villaraigosa's contention last month, Huizar said L.A. does not have a ban on medical marijuana dispensaries since the ordinance "allows for three qualified patients or their caregivers to grow on their own."
The City Council passed the ban on medical marijuana dispensaries amid complaints that many of the pot shops are a neighborhood nuisance and attract crime. Police said some of the shops sold to minors or people without doctor’s prescriptions.
Medical marijuana activists open another attack on L.A.'s pot shop law next week, when they start collecting signatures for a ballot measure to repeal it entirely.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.