With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
LAPD moves forward with Taser-brand body cameras
File: LAPD Officers William Allen, left, and Guillermo Espinoza talk with two people in an argument on the street. Allen and Espinoza are part of LAPD's central station where the body cameras will be tested out for 90 days. LAPD announced Tuesday that they they plan to move forward and use Taser body cameras that offer a cloud-based video storage system.
(
Maya Sugarman/KPCC
)
The Los Angeles Police Department plans to move forward and use Taser-brand body cameras, L.A. Police Commission president Steve Soboroff told KPCC.
Officers field-tested two brands over the past 90 days. The decision came down to three cameras: two made by Taser and the other by a different company, Soboroff said.
“There was a spirited and long process to determine which equipment would be purchased by LAPD,” Soboroff said. “Our department made a determination that one of the Taser cameras was the right one for the LAPD.”
The Taser camera the LAPD chose fits on the chest of an officer, Soboroff said, while the other cameras looked at fit on the ear, hat or sunglasses of an officer.
Support for LAist comes from
“I believe that the on-body cameras will be transformative for law enforcement from both sides of the camera,” Soboroff said. “We’re looking for great transformative results, and the rest of the country frankly is looking at us to see how it works in the big city department.”
Soboroff said he thinks that within six months there will likely between 500 to 600 officers wearing the body cameras.
“My hope is that within a year they will get enough results to where we are able to make another purchase so every officer is wearing them,” Soboroff said.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight. -
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious. -
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent. -
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
Best of LAist