Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

LA County supervisors concerned about limiting use of fire retardant

An air tanker drops fire retardant on a ridge ahead of a fast moving fire in the Angeles National Forest August 30, 2009 near Acton.
An air tanker drops fire retardant on a ridge ahead of a fast moving fire in the Angeles National Forest August 30, 2009 near Acton.
(
Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:55
LA County supervisors concerned about limiting use of fire retardant
LA County supervisors concerned about limiting use of fire retardant

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Tuesday raised concerns about the federal government’s plan to reduce the use of fire retardant during wildfires.

The federal plan responds to a court order in a lawsuit that claimed fire retardant dropped from the air kills fish and pollutes the rivers and streams other animals use.

In a draft environmental impact statement, the U.S. Forest Service has agreed to limit its use of retardant near waterways – unless human life is at risk or the terrain prevents other resources from reaching the fire.

The Forest Service still strongly supports the use of fire retardants. Officials say that in the last decade, only 1 in every 5,000 aerial drops has affected waterways.

L.A. County supervisors fear that the restrictions could hamper firefighting. Supervisor Mike Antonovich said it could allow fires to grow larger, faster. He referred to the 2009 Station Fire in the Angeles National Forest that burned 160,000 acres and killed two firefighters.

The supervisors have asked congressional leaders to closely examine the Forest Service plan.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right