This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
LA DA launches inquiry into supervisors' spending
A view of City Hall in downtown Los Angeles, Calif.
(
Omar Omar/Flickr CC
)
Listen
0:53
LA DA launches inquiry into supervisors' spending
LA DA launches inquiry into supervisors' spending
The Los Angeles County District Attorney has opened an inquiry into the spending practices of the L.A. County Board of Supervisors.
The head of the District Attonrey's Public Integrity Unit, David Demerjian, says he launched the inquiry in response to a complaint over possible misappropriation of funds.
Demerjian would not name who filed the complaint, but he said it surfaced on the same day the
That story detailed how supervisors sometimes use millions of dollars in discretionary funds on pet projects or on bolstering their public images.
Examples: Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky spent $200,000 on his new county Web site and Facebook accounts; Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas used $25,000 to buy a place in the magazine Who’s Who in Black L.A.
The spending coincides with the supervisors’ plans to make deep cuts in spending on public safety and social services. Reduced tax revenues and state funding have stretched the county budget.
The District Attorney is also looking into whether the Supervisors violated the Brown Act. The Times' story raised questions about why some decisions on discretionary money are not made in open meetings.
Two other interesting notes on the inquiry:
The Board of Supervisors approves funding for the District Attorney.
The District Attorney, Steve Cooley, is running for State Attorney General — in part on the platform that he is tough on public corruption.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
