Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA cracks down on urban oil drilling near USC

The City of Los Angeles recently slapped some of the toughest restrictions yet on an urban oil and gas site. The decision comes in response to years of complaints about noise, bad smells and the occasional misting of oil onto cars and homes. It's also part of a broader trend toward clamping down on drilling within the city.
In June 2016, the environmental law firm Earthjustice collected residents’ stories and presented them to the Department of City Planning. The idea was to show that the site had become a nuisance to the community.
The drilling site, on Jefferson Boulevard just west of the University of Southern California, contains 36 oil wells that are within 60 feet of occupied multi-unit apartment buildings. A low wall separates them, and there is no noise buffer, vapor capture or enclosure around the site. As part of its petition to the city, Earthjustice found that other urban oil sites located further from homes had stricter regulations. One 43-well site on the corner of Pico Boulevard and Doheny Drive in West L.A. is fully enclosed, noise levels are capped and a quieter, electric drilling rig is required instead of diesel, among other conditions.
“The low-income community-of-color in South Los Angeles where the Jefferson Drill Site is located is entitled, both as a matter of law and as a matter of equity, to receive the same protections that have been afforded to the whiter, wealthier residents near the Doheny Site,” the law firm wrote in its petition.
On October 13, the city’s planning department agreed, finding that the current regulations operator Sentinel Peak Resources must comply with “are not sufficient to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the nearby residential neighborhood.”
Going forward, the company must install a number of new systems: one that continually monitors noise, vibration and records video, another that measures air quality on the perimeter of the property, and a third that captures emissions. The operator also has to point its lighting down and build its walls higher to better enclose the site.
Uduak-Joe Ntuk, L.A.’s petroleum administrator, said the decision was likely to anger both the oil industry and community activists who wanted the site shut down completely.
“I’m trying to find the middle ground,” he said. “What can we do with our land use authority to make sure communities feel safe and companies are operating with the best available technologies and monitoring procedures.”
But Richard Parks, president of the Reedemer Community Partnership, a community development non-profit in South LA that has been outspoken against the Jefferson oil site, said he was relieved.
“There’s growing awareness that drilling is incompatible with neighborhoods,” he said.
Indeed, the decision comes as urban oil and gas is under increased scrutiny in Los Angeles. A 2015 lawsuit alleging racially discriminatory practices in permitting oil wells resulted in new practices at the city planning department. Last summer, the city attorney’s office penalized a nearby operator, AllenCo Energy, requiring it to meet similar strict conditions before they could re-open. And at the request of the city council, L.A.’s new petroleum administrator is currently studying what it would take to phase out drilling entirely within the city.
Sentinel Peak did not respond to multiple requests for comment, and the California Independent Petroleum Association declined to speak on the record about the decision because they are involved in a lawsuit against the city related to oil permitting issues. The new requirements take effect October 30 unless the company appeals.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.