Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

LA County supervisors advance plan to replace Men’s Central Jail

FILE - In this Sept. 28, 2011 photo, people walk past the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Men's Central Jail facility in Los Angeles. A federal judge has given initial approval to an agreement that requires the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department to improve conditions in its jails for inmates using wheelchairs and others with mobility impairments. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File)
In this Sept. 28, 2011 photo, people walk past the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Men's Central Jail facility in Los Angeles. The county board of supervisors on Tuesday, August 11, 2015, voted to move ahead on a plan to build a 3,885-bed facility to replace the jail.
(
Damian Dovarganes/AP
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Listen 0:52
LA County supervisors advance plan to replace Men’s Central Jail

In a surprise vote on Tuesday, Los Angeles County supervisors decided to move ahead with a 3,885-bed replacement for Men’s Central Jail in Downtown Los Angeles.

The Board of Supervisors had put the original 4,800-bed replacement facility on hold while they studied ways to divert mentally ill out of the jail system. Supervisors have disagreed on how big the jail needs to be, but this appeared to be the magic number.

The vote came down 3–1, with Supervisors Mark Ridley-Thomas, Sheila Kuehl and Mike Antonovich voting to move the jail plan forward and Supervisor Don Knabe, who called for a larger facility, voting no. Supervisor Hilda Solis, who called for a smaller jail, abstained.

Peter Eliasberg, legal director of the ACLU of Southern California, was skeptical of the need for the large jail.

“I’m not persuaded by what would justify the size,” he said.

He also criticized the board for taking up the controversial issue without first notifying the public.

“I think it’s a pretty clear violation of the Brown Act,” he said.

Sponsored message

The board was not originally scheduled to take up the jail question–which in the past, has drawn in hundreds of speakers who oppose jail building. Originally, they were scheduled only to take up a proposal to fund programs that divert mentally ill out of jail.

That proposal, which puts $100 million towards jail diversion, also passed, with Knabe providing the sole vote against.

“This is real money that if used well can make an enormous difference in people’s lives,” Eliasberg said.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today