Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

LA City Council rejects LAPD hiring freeze

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

The Los Angeles City Council rejected a recommendation today to freeze hiring at the Police Department, choosing to maintain staffing at 9,963 officers this fiscal year.

The council voted 10-3 in favor of having the Police Academy hire a combined total of 90 recruits in April and May, and rejected a proposal to delay those classes until the next fiscal year.

Testifying before the council, Police Chief Charlie Beck warned that allowing the size of the force to shrink from 9,963 — a number agreed upon months ago by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and the City Council — would lead to an increase in crime.

"A current Rand study done by the best experts in this state, maybe in this country, (showed) a 1 percent reduction in the size of the Police Department equates to a 1 percent increase in the homicide rate,'' Beck said. "It equates to a 0.5 percent increase in robbery rates.''

"I can give you the exact numbers: It's four more homicides, it's 40 more robberies, it's 80 more burglaries,'' Beck said.

Councilman Bernard Parks, chairman of the council's Budget and Finance Committee — which recommended the hiring freeze, noted the Police Department was in the red by $88 million until today, when the council voted to reduce the deficit by taking $20 million out of its emergency reserve fund.

"If we can't sustain 9,963 (officers) today, why do we think we're going to sustain it next year?'' he said.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today