Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

Some LA City Council members outraged over proposed redistricting

Proposed L.A. redistricting map
Proposed L.A. redistricting map

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen
Some LA City Council members outraged over proposed redistricting

The battle for political power in the city of Los Angeles has taken a new turn with the release of new City Council district boundaries. The proposed map is just a draft, but already there are claims of backroom deals and political payback.

The proposed map angered L.A. City Councilwoman Jan Perry the most — her district would lose much of downtown and its economic wealth.

“That’s old school patronage politics," Perry said, "which is 'I’m going to punish you and take away your assets and then nobody will pay any attention to you or you wont be able to get anything done.'”

Who is punishing her and why? Perry said Councilman Herb Wesson is mad she didn’t support him for council president, and cut a backroom deal with the 21-member redistricting commission.

Sponsored message

His spokesman denied that, as did the vice chair of the panel Jackie Dupont-Walker. “No. We have absolutely kept this process as transparent and open as possible," Dupont-Walker said. "There were no pre-existing maps that I saw.”

The map angered Councilman Tom LaBonge too. His district would stretch further west and lose tony Hancock Park. He accused the commission of “fracturing” communities and “ignoring the will of the people.”

Commisioner Dupont-Walker suggested the change leaves fewer cumbersome districts that stretch from the San Fernando Valley into the L.A. basin.

On the Westside, Councilman Bill Rosendahl opposed separating LAX from neighborhoods around it.

“I’m expecting gridlock out of this whole process," Rosendahl said, "and it will end up in the Council chambers.”

That would make the commission’s seven public hearings in February moot. Unlike the state’s new redistricting procedures, L.A.'s elected leaders still decide their own political boundaries.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right