With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Judge limits character witness testimony in upcoming Baca trial
Baca (center) and his attorney Nathan Hochman (right) outside a federal court in Los Angeles after a judge declared a mistrial in the obstruction of justice case against him.
(
Frank Stoltze/KPCC
)
Listen
0:43
Judge limits character witness testimony in upcoming Baca trial
As attorneys prepare to retry former L.A. Sheriff Lee Baca, federal prosecutors have successfully blocked Baca's defense team from calling character witnesses to testify on his prior “good acts.”
Baca is accused of conspiracy, obstruction of justice and lying in connection with a scheme to thwart an FBI investigation into the inmate abuse in the jails.
A prior trial ended in a hopelessly deadlocked jury, forcing a new trial, which is expected to begin later this month.
During a hearing Monday, U.S. District Judge Percy Anderson said testimony from character witnesses could confuse the jury and prove to be a "waste of time."
Sponsored message
Baca's defense attorney, Nathan Hochman, argued that testimony of character witnesses was necessary to refute prosecutors' claim that Baca's intent was to corrupt.
“That couldn’t be further from the truth,” Hochman told the judge Monday.
During Baca's previous trial, Hochman argued that Baca cooperated with other federal investigations and sought to improve conditions in the jail. He also called a number of character witnesses to testify on Baca's long record of service in the sheriff's department.
For the new trial, a pool of between 200 and 250 potential jurors have been summoned, and jury selection is expected to begin Feb. 21 or 22.
In preparation for that trial, Anderson also ordered that Baca remove the sheriff’s star pin he’d worn on his lapel each day of the previous trial. Prosecutors had asked for the pin to be taken off, arguing it was "essentially testifying" without taking the stand.
Baca’s is the latest trial in a jail scandal that led to the convictions or guilty pleas of several former department employees. FBI agents began a civil rights investigation into inmate abuse at L.A. County jails, but found their efforts blocked in 2011 when sheriff’s employees hid an inmate informant working with the FBI. Sheriff's deputies later threatened to arrest an FBI agent at her house.
Prosecutors argue Baca was the heartbeat of the scheme and later lied to federal investigators. Baca’s defense attorney says the scheme was orchestrated by Undersheriff Paul Tanaka, who kept Baca in the dark.
Sponsored message
*This story has been updated. The headline has been clarified to reflect that character witnesses are barred from speaking to Baca's past "good acts".
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
