Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
How breathing even clean air can kill you

Thousands of older adults are dying prematurely every year from air pollution – even though the air they’re breathing is legally clean and safe.
A new study by researchers at Harvard University of all 48 million Americans aged 65 and older on Medicare found people were dying after just a single day of breathing air that met federal standards, but was somewhat dirty. The study was published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
“The current understanding is, the Environmental Protection Agency is setting safety standards and if pollution is below that standard, everyone is safe,” said data scientist and co-author Francesca Dominici. “That’s basically not what the scientific evidence is saying.”
EPA regulates six airborne pollutants, including fine particles and ozone (or smog). Its air standards are supposed to “protect the health of 'sensitive' populations such as asthmatics, children, and the elderly," according to the agency's website.
For particulate matter, EPA set the safe level of short-term exposure to fine particles at 35 micrograms per cubic meter of air and 70 parts per billion for ozone. But Dominici and her colleagues found that people were dying after breathing air that was much cleaner than that. For every additional unit of ozone in the air, she found an additional 250 seniors died prematurely over the course of that year. It was even worse for particulate matter: 550 additional seniors died annually for each additional unit of particulate matter they were exposed to.
The researchers concluded there is no safe level of exposure to either pollutant.
"It's that simple," Dominici said, "the lower you go, the more lives you save."
Jennifer Ailshire, a professor of gerontology at USC, said the study raised questions about whether current EPA standards actually protect "sensitive" groups.
“I always wonder if the standard that’s set for the entire population is perhaps a little too high for what we would want for older populations,” she said.
Elderly adults are more vulnerable to air pollution because their age gives them a higher chance of having other chronic diseases that are exacerbated by breathing dirty air. Tiny particles of soot, smoke or vehicle exhaust just a fraction the width of a grain of sand can lodge deep inside the lungs or pass into the bloodstream, causing inflammation.
Younger adults or seniors without preexisting conditions like asthma, heart disease or other cardiovascular illnesses can still be affected by air pollution, but “it’s unlikely to result in a hospitalization or death,” said Ailshire.
In greater Los Angeles, air quality routinely exceeds federal standards for ozone and particulate matter. This year has been particularly bad: between June 1 and August 30, 2017, there were just two weeks where ozone levels were considered safe. And December 29 is the fifth day in a row where particulate levels exceeded EPA standards.
Ailshire recommends older adults treat air quality like weather and check it routinely before exercising outdoors.
But Dominici said her study calls for more than just increased personal responsibility, because it is nearly impossible for people to avoid contaminated air. “Everyone is affected by exposure to pollution," she said.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.