With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
GOP tax plan has outsized impact on SoCal homeowners, homebuyers
Listen
• 0:58
Future homeowners in high-cost areas such as Southern California would be disproportionately hit under the GOP tax proposal released Thursday.
(
Terry Vine/Getty Images
)
Congressional Republicans introduced a tax overhaul plan that would disproportionately affect future homebuyers in high-priced real estate markets such as Southern California.
Right now, homeowners can take deductions on home mortgages worth up to $1 million. But the GOP plan would cap these deductions at $500,000 for future homeowners.
That won’t change things much for states with low housing costs. But it’s a different story in Los Angeles, where the median home price tops $630,000. Geoff McIntosh, president of the California Association of Realtors, predicts that fewer homebuyers will be able to enter the market.
"They’re going to be forced to be renters or be forced to consider moving out of state or at least moving further from their place of employment," McIntosh said.
Support for LAist comes from
Tens of thousands of new homeowners could potentially be affected. Research by ATTOM Data Solutions shows that 15 percent of all homes sold or refinanced in Los Angeles County this year so far involved mortgages above $500,000.
The percentage is 18 percent in Orange County and 14 percent in San Diego County. In lower-cost San Bernardino County, the share of $500,000-plus mortgages is 3 percent.
McIntosh said the mortgage deduction change will only squeeze homeowners who will lose out through other aspects of the GOP plan, such as its call to eliminate the deduction for state and local income taxes.
That deduction can be significant for many Californians, said UCLA law professor Jason Oh.
“Because of how high state and local taxes are in California, more Californians itemize than in many other states,” he said.
About one in three taxpayers itemizes in California.
Republicans say many would still benefit under their plan, thanks to a bigger standard deduction. The bill calls for raising the standard deduction from $6,350 to $12,000 for individuals, and from $12,700 to $24,000 for married couples.
Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Sherman Oaks), who once chaired California's tax agency, believes the GOP is also pursuing another goal with this part of its tax plan.
“It also is designed to put political pressure on California to become more like [low-tax and low-spending] Texas and Mississippi,” Sherman said.
The idea is that ending the deduction for state and local income taxes could spark a popular push for tax cuts in California, he argued.
Oh said he’s interested to see how state and local governments react to this new federal tax system, if it becomes law.
He thinks many states could choose to lower their income taxes, and offset those cuts with higher property taxes. That could give their home-owning residents more to deduct from their federal tax bill.
“But unfortunately in California, because of Prop. 13, that kind of move away from non-deductible income taxes and toward deductible property taxes is hard to do,” Oh said.
Prop. 13 caps property taxes in California at 1 percent of a home’s value at the point of purchase.
Housing advocates are also concerned that the GOP tax proposal will have a negative impact on the construction of affordable housing.
A planned reduction in the corporate income tax cut could potentially hurt the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program. That program offers companies tax breaks through a set-up where affordable housing developers sell tax credits to corporate investors.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Immigration raids have caused some U.S. citizens to carry their passports to the store, to school or to work. But what documents to have on you depends on your citizenship. -
The historic properties have been sitting vacant for decades and were put on the market as-is, with prices ranging from $750,000 to $1.75 million. -
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high.
Best of LAist