Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

No verdict in Old Fire murder trial after 4 days of deliberation

This Oct. 30, 2003 file photo shows a view from a burned out home showing a pine tree forest and homes which were consumed by the Old Fire as it roared through the community of Cedar Glen in Lake Arrowhead, Calif. A grand jury indicted Rickie Fowler on Tuesday Oct. 20, 2009, on five counts of murder for this 2003 wildfire in Southern California that destroyed about 1,000 homes and was linked to a half-dozen heart attack deaths.
The 2003 wildfire Fowler is accused of setting destroyed about 1,000 homes and was linked to a half-dozen heart attack deaths.
(
Kevork Djansezian/AP
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 1:40
No verdict in Old Fire murder trial after 4 days of deliberation

San Bernardino jurors ended their fourth day of deliberations Tuesday without reaching a verdict in the murder trial of the man accused of setting the 2003 Old Fire, but were expected to reconvene on Wednesday in San Bernardino County Superior Court.

Rickie Lee Fowler is on trial on five counts of felony murder, felony arson and aggravated arson. He potentially faces the death penalty if convicted.

Five people died during the Old Fire of what authorities called stress-related heart attacks, but all of the victims also had pre-existing health problems. That creates a potential conundrum for jurors: Can they convict Fowler of murder without the kind of direct physical evidence found in many trials?

Prosecutors say the motivation for the fire was revenge, alleging that Fowler set it to settle a score with an old acquaintance (who survived).

Sponsored message

But five other San Bernardino Mountain residents died of heart attacks — brought on, prosecutors claim, by the stress of trying to escape the fast-moving fire.

“The reason the prosecutor would go for murder as opposed to manslaughter is that when you’re talking about felony murder, it doesn’t really matter what the defendant intended,” explains Loyola Law School professor Laurie Levenson.

All of the victims were male, between the ages of 54 and 93, and each of them also had serious pre-existing health conditions — including heart disease, high blood pressure, obesity and emphysema. Defense attorneys argued that none of the victims had a buildup of soot or other wildfire debris in their lungs at the time of their deaths, something Levenson says could make it tough to convict Fowler.

“Jurors know how serious it is to hold someone responsible for murder," says Levenson. "And they might not feel comfortable unless they have more direct evidence that the fire, as opposed to preconditions, caused the deaths.”

Fowler tried to pin the deadly arson fire on a friend (now deceased) who he claims snatched a lit road flare from his hand and tossed it into some dry brush. That ignited a monstrous 90,000 acre wildfire that raged for over one week and destroyed hundreds of homes.

If convicted of murder, Fowler could get the death penalty.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right