Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Filmmakers sue to put 'Happy Birthday' song back in public domain

A girl looks at a cake at a 40th birthday party.
A girl looks at a cake at a 40th birthday party.
(
Brian Snelson/Flickr/Creative Commons
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

A music licensing company in Santa Monica claims it owns the copyright to the "Happy Birthday" song, but a production company filed a $5 million lawsuit in New York on Thursday challenging the claim.

Good Morning to You Productions says it paid a $1,500 licensing fee to use "Happy Birthday to You" in a scene from its documentary about the song. The filmmakers want their money back, and they want to make the song free to use for everyone.

Some researchers trace the song's origins to the 1890s. Los Angeles-based entertainment attorney Jonathan Handel says any work created before 1923 is no longer under copyright, but publishing company Warner/Chappell Music may have a valid argument in its rights to the song. Warner/Chappell is a unit of the massive Warner Music Group, which owns such music labels as Asylum, Atlantic, Elektra, Nonesuch, Reprise, Rhino and Warner Bros.

"One of the issues here is that Warner/Chappell does have a copyright based on a piano arrangement of the song that, I think, was done in 1935, and what the plantiffs say here is, at most, they've got a copyright of the piano arrangement, not the underlying song itself," Handel said.

Handel said many people are uncomfortable with the degree to which copyright law has been extended in recent years. 

"The extension of 20 additional years of copyright in the late 20th century was largely lobbied for at the insistence of Disney, who didn't want Mickey Mouse to fall into the public domain," Handel said. "So there's a real corporate interest in strong copyrights, even though the Constitution — which is where copyright is derived from — says that copyright should be a balancing act between the rights of creators on one hand and the rights of later users on the other."

The class-action lawsuit includes plantiffs that paid to use the "Happy Birthday" song anytime within the last four years.

Sponsored message

The licensing company has not commented on the lawsuit.

Happy Birthday Song Lawsuit

?

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today