This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
Few details on how to pay for California's universal health care plan
California's legislature inches forward on single-payer health care bill.
(
Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
)
Listen
0:52
Few details on how to pay for California's universal health care plan
On a day when state lawmakers were supposed to report the fiscal impacts of a proposal for the state to take over healthcare, authors of the plan acknowledged there remained "enormous uncertainty" around the cost of the plan. Senate Bill 562—The Healthy California Act went before the senate appropriations committee Monday.
Senator Ricardo Lara (D-Long Beach) presented the bill to the committee he chairs, acknowledging the exact details of a plan to finance such a system weren’t completely clear.
California already spends between $350 and $400 billion a year on healthcare costs.
On Monday, Lara presented a fiscal impact report to the committee that assumes $200 billion of those costs would continue to be covered by existing federal, state, and local funding. The remaining costs could come from reduced administrative expenses and a new 15 percent payroll tax.
Opponents testified that single-payer would be financially unsustainable in the state, pointing to the bill’s lack of specificity.
If the bill moves forward, Lara promised to return to the committee with a comprehensive report on costs by health care experts at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
"Once this report comes out, we [will] have it analyzed by other independent agencies to ensure that the numbers and what is being proposed is something that is workable, feasible and sustainable," Lara testified.
Sponsored message
Supporters of the bill hope it will improve health access and reduce costs to Californians.
The plan would require no additional out-of-pocket costs from patients. Instead, the state of California would pay for doctor’s visits with a fee-for-service system.
Insurance companies, brokers, and the business community collectively oppose the bill. They say the plan would lead to higher taxes and hurt the state economy.
On Thursday, the committee will decide whether it will release the bill for a senate vote early next month.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
