Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

Family of man shot by Long Beach police awarded $2.9 million

Trevor Woods (left) talks about his brother Tyler Woods, 19, who was shot and killed by Long Beach police after a foot pursuit. They were at a news conference announcing the filing of a claim against the city on April 14, 2014.
Trevor Woods (left) talks about his brother Tyler Woods, 19, who was shot and killed by Long Beach police after a foot pursuit. A jury found police had no justification to shoot Woods.
(
Erika Aguilar/KPCC
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 1:01
Family of man shot by Long Beach police awarded $2.9 million
Long Beach police officers said they believed Tyler Woods was reaching for a gun in his waistband and shot him 19 times as he climbed on top of a roof following a foot chase.

A federal jury in Los Angeles deliberated for less than two hours Wednesday before deciding two Long Beach police officers were not justified in their fatal shooting of a 19-year-old man in 2013.

The officers shot Tyler Woods 19 times. Woods, who was African-American, was unarmed.

The shooting occurred around 3 a.m. after a traffic stop. Woods was a passenger. He ran away while police were questioning him and ended up on a nearby rooftop.

Long Beach officers Daniel Martinez and John Fagan said they believed Woods was armed when they fired their weapons at him from the ground.

Sponsored message

Martinez held his front waistband as he ran away, according to the officers. Police are trained to suspect someone has a gun if they are holding their waistband. In addition, officers had been told over their radios that Woods had an outstanding warrant for armed robbery.

L.A. County District Attorney Jackie Lacey determined the shooting was justified.

“Given the totality of the facts in the present case, we find that officers Martinez and Fagan acted lawfully in self-defense and in defense of others,” the letter written by her office, declining to file charges, said. The letter cited Woods' “desperate efforts to escape” as another reason the officers were justified to shoot.

The jury in the federal civil rights case saw the circumstances differently, finding the officers were negligent. They awarded $1 million to Woods' parents and $1.9 million to his four-year-old son.

“The jury’s verdict in this case reflects a shifting tide among the community,” said attorney John Fattahi, who represents Woods' son. “When a police officer shoots and kills an unarmed person, we will not uncritically accept ‘he reached for his waistband’ as an excuse.”

Attorneys for Woods’ parents noted that it had been broadcast on police radios that Woods had been patted down for weapons before fleeing. Officers Martinez and Fagan said they did not hear the broadcast.

The Long Beach Shooting Review Board found the shooting in policy.

Sponsored message

But then-Police Chief Jim McDonnell overruled the decision. McDonnell is now sheriff of Los Angeles County.

The incident was one of several controversial police shootings to rock Long Beach in recent years. In 2013, a jury found police used excessive force when they shot another unarmed man, Douglas Zerby. His family was awarded $6.5 million.

Later this year, Long Beach is expected to face two more jury trials involving men fatally shot by Long Beach police officers, according to attorney Dale Galipo. One was allegedly armed with a baseball bat, the other with a wooden stick.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right