With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
DWP overbilling settlement gets conditional approval from judge
This April 7, 2010, file photo shows the exterior of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in Los Angeles. A new Department of Water and Power billing system cost ratepayers millions in erroneous charges. A judge on Monday conditionally approved a settlement that would require the utility to pay back every customer who was overcharged.
(
Nick Ut/AP
)
A judge has granted conditional approval to a settlement that calls for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power to pay out tens of millions of dollars in refunds to customers over the botched rollout of its new billing system.
DWP has blamed accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers for failing to install the system properly in September 2013. The new system led to customers being overbilled for late payment charges, calculation errors and estimated bills masking leaks or electricity loss, among other reasons.
Under the proposed settlement, any customer who was overcharged will receive a credit in the full amount they were overcharged, according to the DWP. Anyone who is no longer a customer will receive a refund.
The DWP has said the total payouts would be less than $10 for most customers, though in total the deal would cost the utility $44 million.
Support for LAist comes from
DWP praised the decision Monday from Judge Elihu Berle.
"With this agreement, every customer who was affected will be repaid 100 cents on the dollar. It also includes benchmarks and key performance indicators that we fully intend to meet and report on to an independent monitor appointed by the court on a quarterly basis for 18 months," the utility said in a prepared statement.
L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti called the ruling a "big step towards closing the chapter on overbilling at the LADWP."
"As we continue to strengthen the performance of our public utility and improve customer service, this settlement implements reforms that will prevent this from happening again," Garcetti said in a statement.
DWP touted its progress in fixing the problems with the new billing system, noting that call hold times have dropped from 30 minutes to below three.
Consumer advocates were less pleased, noting that Tuesday's decision was the third time Judge Berle has postponed granting full preliminary approval of the settlement. Consumer Watchdog called for several changes to the settlement.
The advocacy group said some customers are currently paying installments on bills they don't actually owe. The group called for known refunds and credits to be issued without delay.
Support for LAist comes from
It also said DWP should accept a smaller deposit from customers starting installment plans and that the utility should not be allowed to threaten disconnection to force customers into repayment over incorrect bills.
"The DWP has a chance to restore the faith many ratepayers have lost in it and we hope it takes that opportunity seriously before submitting a revised agreement that better informs and protects ratepayers," Consumer Watchdog's Jamie Court said in a statement.
The next court date for a ruling will be Feb. 5, though the judge ruled that Dec. 21 would be the date of record to allow customers to be notified sooner of their rights under the settlement.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The rock legend joins LAist for a lookback on his career — and the next chapter of his music. -
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain. -
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember. -
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care. -
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings. -
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
Best of LAist