Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Developers, billboard companies on record lobbying pace in LA
Businesses paid lobbying firms $13.5 million during the first three months of this year to meet with elected and appointed LA city officials to push their causes, according to a new report from the city Ethics Commission.
(
Meghan McCarty/KPCC
)
Developers in the midst of a building boom put the city on pace for record spending on lobbyists to influence Los Angeles city council members, commissioners and city staffers.
In the first three months of this year, businesses of all kinds seeking support for their projects spent $13.5 million on lobbying, according to a new report from the city Ethics Commission. Nearly half the money was concentrated among ten lobbying firms.
The ethics commission analysis of the top-spending ten clients shows nine of them spent a collective $1.4 million on lobbyists to contact city officials about building projects. Clear Channel, a billboard company, spent $155,000 to round out the top ten.
The disclosures published on the commission's website do not list which council member, commissioner or staffer spoke with lobbyists.
Support for LAist comes from
The development projects are as diverse as the two-tower Palladium Residences in Hollywood approved by the city council in March to a new stadium for a Major League Soccer stadium at Exposition Park.
Though spending on lobbying was brisk in the first three months of the year, it wasn't a quarterly record. That was set in the last quarter of 2015, when businesses spent $14 million. If spending comparable to the first quarter of 2016 continues, the annual total could top $54 million, a half-million dollars more than last year's total.
A company known as CRE-HAR Crossroads SPV LLC was the biggest spender in the first quarter of 2016, putting $220,660 into lobbying services in pursuit of approval of a hotel, shops, homes and offices surrounding the famous Crossroads of the World shops in Hollywood.
Billboards among top spenders
The billboard company Clear Channel Outdoor/ iHeartMedia inc. was fifth among the top ten spenders in the first quarter, putting nearly $155,000 into lobbying for digital signage and billboards.
A citywide sign ordinance has been working its way through the Los Angeles legislative process for years. The Citywide Planning Commission recommended a version last year that would limit most signs to special districts and would enforce city rules against hundreds of signs that have no city permits. The ordinance is pending before the city council's Planning and Land Use Management Committee. Recently, the state Supreme Court upheld the city's ban on new digital billboards, upping the pressure on sign advocates to get the city council to approve a new ordinance that permits them.
Billboard companies collectively spent about $279,000 on lobbying in the first quarter of 2016, however other businesses seeking to influence the direction and content of a citywide sign ordinance also hired lobbyists.
Support for LAist comes from
Overall spending on billboard-related lobbying ran to about $545,000, according to disclosures filed by the lobbyists. The actual amount spent on lobbying on the sign ordinance could be more because the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission rules permit fairly broad descriptions of the topics lobbyists raise with the city officials they meet.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist