Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Decades after LA Riots, unemployment and poverty persist in South LA

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

The communities most affected by the L.A. Riots have seen little, if any, economic growth during the past two-and-a-half decades, according to a UCLA study released Thursday. It found that, in some neighborhoods, unemployment and poverty have worsened despite efforts by community leaders to boost economic development.

For the study, UCLA researchers spent 25 years gathering unemployment and poverty data on six L.A. neighborhoods — Koreatown, Westlake and four quadrants of South L.A. — to analyze how economic revitalization efforts have helped or hurt the communities.

The team, led by Paul Ong, director of the Center for Neighborhood Knowledge at UCLA, examined the demographic and economic data and compared it to greater L.A. County’s unemployment and poverty rates:

The unemployment rate for six neighborhoods that suffered heavy damage during the '92 Riots has remained higher than the rest of L.A. County.
The unemployment rate for six neighborhoods that suffered heavy damage during the '92 Riots has remained higher than the rest of L.A. County.
(
UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs
)
The poverty rate for six neighborhoods that suffered heavy damage during the '92 Riots has remained higher than the rest of L.A. County.
The poverty rate for six neighborhoods that suffered heavy damage during the '92 Riots has remained higher than the rest of L.A. County.
(
UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs
)

The data doesn’t paint a complete picture of all engagement, organization and mobilization strategies within the neighborhoods since 1992, according to the study. Instead, it shows trends that point to challenges that have always put the six communities in the study behind the rest of the county, even before the riots took place, Ong told KPCC.

Ong wrote in the study:

Sponsored message
"Improving the lives of those in the most affected areas has been elusive in the face of growing income and wealth inequality, and gentrification-driven displacement. The research in this brief and others conducted at UCLA show a critical need to renew a commitment to bending the trajectory of economic development towards justice, to embrace inclusive people and place strategies."

Ong said the best chance for improvement is if everyone in the community is able to make a contribution.

“People who are in the neighborhood — the residents, small business owners, the churches — they ought to be part of the process in defining what we ought to be doing and how we prioritize the use of our resources,” he said.

The UCLA study also called for action to improve the socioeconomic status of the six neighborhoods:

  • A renewed commitment to revitalizing the affected areas
  • Renewed stakeholder efforts to address development challenges
  • People and place strategies that are inclusive, driven by local residents, leaders, businesses and organizations

Before 1992, the six neighborhoods in UCLA’s study consisted of some of the most economically disadvantaged neighborhoods in all of L.A., the study said. Frustration within the neighborhoods toward public institutions that left them behind allowed people living there to reach their highest boiling point during the '92 Riots. 

Some eastern parts of South L.A. have seen drops in unemployment since 1990, according to the study — but not by much, Ong said. Parts of South L.A. have a poverty rate close to 45 percent, he said, which is more than double L.A. County’s poverty level as a whole.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today