Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

Confidential report yields new details on fatal Inglewood police shooting

An activist holds up a pictures of Kisha Michael, left, and Marquintan Sandlin. Inglewood Police have yet to explain why they fatally shot the two in February. (11-02-16)
An activist holds up a pictures of Kisha Michael, left, and Marquintan Sandlin. Inglewood Police have yet to explain why they fatally shot the two.
(
Frank Stoltze/KPCC
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:50
Confidential report yields new details on fatal Inglewood police shooting
A confidential report says police used an airhorn and sirens to try to rouse a man and woman found unconscious in their car. It does not explain why police shot them.

An incident report on the fatal shooting of a man and woman by Inglewood police last year reveals that officers took extraordinary measures to try to awaken them after finding them unconscious inside their car. But the document does not explain the circumstances that led police to open fire on the pair, because the officer who wrote the report was not at the scene when the shooting occurred.

The confidential three-and-a-half page "Crime Report" obtained by KPCC says officers came upon Kisha Michael and Marquintan Sandlin in a Chevy Malibu at the intersection of Manchester Blvd. and Inglewood Ave. shortly after 3 a.m. on Feb. 21, 2016.

Although the two were unconscious, officers backed off after they determined that Michael had a handgun in her lap, the report says. It describes how police parked four patrol cars right next to the Malibu to box it in, and then tried using flashing lights, an airhorn and blaring sirens to rouse the two, without success.

Finally, one officer tried to wake them up using his patrol car, according to the report, whose author's name is blacked out on the document.

Sponsored message

"Officer Parcella made contact with the rear bumper of the suspect vehicle several times, but was met with negative results," the report says.

Eventually, officers opened fire. Michael, 31, was hit 13 times and died at the scene. Sandlin, 32, was struck twice and died later at a hospital. But the incident report only describes the aftermath of the shooting, because the author had left the scene with a second officer to assist on another call.

On their way back to the intersection, the officers heard over the radio that their colleagues had opened fire on the two people in the car.

"While en route, Sergeant [name redacted] advised [Inglewood Police Department] communications that an Officer Involved Shooting had occurred," the report states. 

It goes on to say that when the author returned to the scene, he saw "a black armored vehicle (SWAT Bearcat) positioned directly behind the suspect vehicle," replacing the patrol car that was there before.

Sandlin was lying on his back approximately 15 feet directly behind the Malibu, according to the report. Paramedics were working to revive him.

Michael was lying approximately one foot to the north, or passenger side, of the Malibu, also under treatment by paramedics.

Sponsored message

The Inglewood Police Department did not return calls seeking comment on the report.

Michael was the mother of three boys. Sandlin was the father of four boys. They were out on a date, according to family members.

Ever since the shooting, the Inglewood PD has declined to say what triggered the fatal encounter. That's not the approach taken by the LAPD, the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department and most smaller agencies in Southern California, which provide within a few days of a shooting at least a preliminary summary of why officers fired on a suspect – with the caveat that a more thorough investigation might reveal something different.

The Inglewood Police Department issued this statement after the shooting, and has said little else since:

"Upon arrival, the officers observed the female occupant was in the possession of a firearm. The officers then took a position of cover and ordered the occupants to exit the vehicle. An officer involved shooting then occurred."

It’s unclear if Michael and Sandlin were asleep or passed out when officers first came upon them. Both had blood alcohol levels over the legal driving limit and Michael had trace amounts of methamphetamine, according to the coroner’s autopsies.

The author of the report and his or her partner noted something else when they returned to the scene:

"We observed Officers S[ean]. Reidy, A[ndrew]. Cohen, M[ichael]. Jaen, [Richard] Parcella, [Jason] Cantrell and Sergeant [name redacted] standing in the parking lot of 345 W. Manchester (7-Eleven)."

Sponsored message

This week, Inglewood Mayor James Butts announced that all five of the officers in that group are no longer members of the department. He would not say whether the officers were fired or they left of their own accord, citing California’s police privacy laws.

The Inglewood PD's Internal Affairs Division has conducted a thorough review of the shooting, according to the department. But Butts said that report remains confidential.

The attorney representing Michael's mother and three children said he’s anxious to see that review, arguing that he's entitled to it because the family has filed a federal wrongful death lawsuit against the city and the police department.

"We still don’t know why she was shot," said Attorney Milton Grimes, who represented Rodney King when he sued the LAPD after his videotaped beating in 1991.

The city has indicated its willing to settle the suit, said Grimes, but Michael’s mother is uninterested until she gets more answers.

"Before we resolve this case, we need to know what happened," Grimes said.

The L.A. County District Attorney's office is investigating the incident, as it does with all officer-involved shootings in the county. The DA will determine whether the officers acted criminally and should be prosecuted.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right