Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
California's water conservation targets have been revised, which is good news for many SoCal providers

Under standards posted Thursday afternoon, the water districts that provide water around California have new conservation targets. The revised standards follow news that the state narrowly missed Gov. Jerry Brown's conservation mandate of 25 percent over the nine months ending February 2016.
The conservation targets were revised as the Water Board considered information about climate, population and local water use submitted by districts. They're good news for districts such as the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and the city of Long Beach, which conserved water over the past nine months but just barely missed their conservation targets.
In fact, in the South Coast region, which includes much of greater L.A. and San Diego, dozens of suppliers who missed their targets during the nine-month period would have met the new targets.
The comparisons are hypothetical, as mandatory conservation didn't kick in until June last year. The newly-announced targets apply to water use beginning on March 1 of this year, and they could revised again.
Still, the comparisons show many districts that could benefit from the changes.
Seventy-two districts that missed their target would have met their new standard, had it been in place. Forty-three of those were in the South Coast region; those are below.
Water District | Original conservation target (percent) | New conservation target (percent) | Water saved, June - February (percent) |
---|---|---|---|
Alhambra City of | 24 | 22 | 23.04 |
Azusa City of | 20 | 18 | 19.99 |
Big Bear City Community Services District | 16 | 13 | 13.34 |
California Water Service Company Dominguez | 16 | 15 | 15.53 |
California-American Water Company Los Angeles District | 28 | 26 | 27.23 |
Carlsbad Municipal Water District | 28 | 20 | 22.15 |
Castaic Lake Water Agency Santa Clarita Water Division | 32 | 28 | 28.06 |
Cerritos City of | 28 | 21 | 21.32 |
East Valley Water District | 28 | 22 | 24.24 |
Golden State Water Company Artesia | 16 | 9 | 15.44 |
Golden State Water Company Cowan Heights | 36 | 29 | 32.08 |
Golden State Water Company San Dimas | 28 | 26 | 27.77 |
Golden State Water Company Southwest | 12 | 9 | 11.21 |
Hemet City of | 32 | 14 | 19.64 |
Irvine Ranch Water District | 16 | 8 | 14.99 |
Long Beach City of | 16 | 9 | 15.23 |
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power | 16 | 14 | 15.67 |
Lynwood City of | 16 | 10 | 11.22 |
Manhattan Beach City of | 20 | 18 | 18.83 |
Monte Vista Water District | 24 | 22 | 22.21 |
Montebello Land and Water Company | 16 | 9 | 15.91 |
Newhall County Water District | 28 | 25 | 26.65 |
Oceanside City of | 20 | 12 | 19.67 |
Olivenhain Municipal Water District | 32 | 24 | 25.80 |
Ontario City of | 24 | 20 | 20.18 |
Orange City of | 28 | 21 | 26.23 |
Pico Water District | 24 | 18 | 20.37 |
Poway City of | 32 | 24 | 31.11 |
Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District | 32 | 24 | 28.52 |
Rubidoux Community Service District | 28 | 20 | 20.83 |
San Bernardino City of | 28 | 25 | 25.30 |
San Bernardino County Service Area 70J | 28 | 24 | 25.35 |
San Gabriel Valley Fontana Water Company | 28 | 26 | 27.06 |
Santa Fe Irrigation District | 36 | 28 | 32.73 |
Santa Margarita Water District | 24 | 23 | 23.70 |
South Gate City of | 12 | 8 | 11.11 |
South Pasadena City of | 28 | 26 | 27.75 |
Suburban Water Systems San Jose Hills | 24 | 22 | 22.71 |
Tustin City of | 28 | 21 | 25.47 |
Valley Center Municipal Water District | 36 | 28 | 35.18 |
Ventura County Waterworks District No. 8 | 28 | 26 | 27.46 |
Westminster City of | 20 | 13 | 18.10 |
Whittier City of | 20 | 17 | 19.60 |
You can look up water use over the past several months using KPCC's water use tool.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.