Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

California drought: City dwellers only cut water use by 9 percent during unseasonably dry January

Southern Californians used more water this June than last June. It was the first month without mandatory water restrictions.
During an unusually hot and dry January, California's city dwellers saved just 9% of their water use compared to the baseline, according to state officials.
(
Photo by Vinoth Chandar via Flickr Creative Commons
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 0:46
California drought: City dwellers only cut water use by 9 percent during unseasonably dry January

During an unusually dry and warm January, residents of California cities only cut their water use by 9 percent. That’s according to a monthly report from the State Water Resources Control Board, which has been gathering city water use data since June. It compared current use to the same month from 2013, which is the baseline year established by the board.

Governor Jerry Brown asked the state to cut water use by 20 percent about a year ago. In December city dwellers met that goal for the first time, reducing their consumption by about 22 percent statewide.

Water board staffers speaking Tuesday connected the slippage in conservation to climatic conditions.

December was wet, while January was unseasonably dry and warm. California saw the fourth driest January on record, with a statewide average of just around two-thirds of an inch of rain. No rain fell in San Francisco at all that month, and there was scant precipitation in the Central Valley and Southern California. The state also recorded the second hottest temperatures ever.

“The drop in savings we see between December and January indicates that people were really great about turning off their sprinklers when it was raining in December, which is exactly what we wanted them to do,” said Kathryn Landau, an environmental scientists with the water board. “But once the rain stopped in January, people turned those sprinklers right back on.”

Water board chair Felicia Marcus wondered what the new data said about Californians’ ongoing awareness of and response to the drought, now in its fourth year.

“I chose to be optimistic in December,” said Marcus. “I’m not sure how to feel about January.”

Sponsored message

Policy adviser Max Gomberg offered a mixed response. Water savings were encouraging, he said, adding “It is hard to overstate the severity of the drought we’re in. We have dismal snowpack, our reservoirs are low, our groundwater basins are depleted, communities are out of water, farmland is being fallowed, and people are out of work,” he said. “It is a really dismal situation.”

Some highlights of the water board’s report:

  • The City of Los Angeles saw just a 1.1 percent drop in use compared to 2013, the baseline year chosen for all cities statewide. LADWP officials counter that Angelenos are using 22 percent less water than in 2007, when the city first set mandatory restrictions. Still, says LADWP water chief Marty Adams, “the numbers show that we are still too quick to return to old watering habits as soon as the weather gets nice.”
  • Another large south coast city, San Diego, actually increased its water use 4 percent over the baseline year.
  • Regulators offered special kudos to Orange County’s Fountain Valley. That city of 59,227 people saved 31.9 percent of its water use over two years ago.
  • Big Bear is a land of extremes. The City of Big Bear Lake’s Department of Water and Power cut consumption by 21.9 percent over the previous year, while Big Bear Water District users were thirsty, using 10 percent more than they did in 2013. 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today