Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Forest Service has a plan to stop the burn — at least financially

Wildfire creeps burns on the south side of Dry Creek Canyon at the Partrick Fire west of Napa, California on October 12, 2017.
Wildfire creeps burns on the south side of Dry Creek Canyon at the Partrick Fire west of Napa, California on October 12, 2017.
(
David McNew/Getty Images
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

President Trump’s $1.3 billion federal spending bill includes a provision intended to keep the U.S. Forest Service from raiding its forest management and fire prevention budgets to fight wildland fires.

Wildland firefighting is expensive. Last year was the Forest Service’s most expensive year on record, costing more than $2 billion.

When the Forest Service overspends its firefighting budget, it dips into other accounts. Last year, firefighting consumed $527 million from other Forest Service accounts like forest thinning. While the money is generally paid back that borrowing can set off a destructive cycle.

When forests grow too thick, they produce more fuel, making fires more destructive. They are also more vulnerable to beetle infestations that kill trees and add to the dry fuel load.

Thinning projects planned for the Angeles and San Bernardino national forests were delayed due to the transfers, the Forest Service said. 

The federal spending bill signed by the president last week makes an important change. It raises the cap on federal Forest Service spending on firefighting. That higher cap is expected to protect the budget set aside for forest maintenance and tree-thinning from raids for firefighting funds.

Firefighting consumes about 56 percent the U.S. Forest Service budget and it’s expected to use about two-thirds by 2020, according to talking points used by proponents of the funding shift.

Sponsored message

Last year, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue asked Congress to change Forest Service funding to keep the agency from raiding accounts that should be paying for fire prevention. When forests grow too thick, they make fires hotter and more destructive. Thick forests, where more trees have to share a limited rainfall supply, are more susceptible to insect infestation, like the bark beetles that damaged forests in San Bernardino County.

Purdue said that with more funding for forest management, the frequency and severity of wildfires could be reduced.

The new funding structure takes effect in 2020 and extends for eight years. Fire suppression for each of those years is set at $1.011 billion, but may extend up to a cap of $2.5 billion in the first year. That cap rises by $100 million each year to $2.95 billion by 2027.

The higher amount allocated for wildland firefighting, in theory, is supposed to keep the Forest Service from tapping other funds, like the one for forest management.

A change that the Forest Service wanted but failed to get is to let federal disaster emergency funds be used for firefighting, just as they have been used in past years to respond to earthquake and hurricanes. That was not in the appropriations bill signed last week.

This story is part of Elemental: Covering Sustainability, a new multimedia collaboration between Cronkite News, Arizona PBS, KJZZ, KPCC, Rocky Mountain PBS and PBS SoCal.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right