Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Blue Cut Fire commander says evacuation holdouts didn't detract from firefight

At least half the residents whose homes were threatened by the Blue Cut Fire ignored mandatory evacuation orders, but the holdouts' presence in no way affected the fire suppression strategy or resources, according to the top official overseeing the effort.
Having so many people stay behind when asked to leave does ratchet up the risk to firefighters and residents, but on this fire, at least, no ill effects resulted, said Rocky Opliger, incident commander heading up the Southern California Interagency Incident Command Team 4.
Despite the lack of consequences, Opliger said he's frustrated, noting that authorities legally cannot force people to leave their residences.
"Unfortunately, it's going to take a catastrophic event that we will have fatalities, and it's not a matter of 'if' — it's 'when,'" he said.
The Blue Cut Fire burned about 36,000 acres, including 105 homes and more than 200 other structures in communities near the Cajon Pass.
Fire Tracker: Blue Cut Fire in San Bernardino County
Although it is fire authorities who request the evacuation orders, it is law enforcement officers who carry them out. Deputies of the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department go door-to-door logging the names and addresses of the people who ignore the evacuation orders.
Based on those contacts, only 40-50 percent of the 82,000 people who were under mandatory evacuation orders in communities around the Cajon Pass actually left, said department spokeswoman Jodi Miller. That's including the communities of Phelan, Lytle Creek, Wrightwood, Devore and Cajon Valley.
Even if those residents had heeded the call to leave, however, firefighters would have dropped the fire retardant and water in the same places, sent fire engines to protect homes and buildings in the same places, and sent hand crews to the same front lines, Opliger said.
But the risk to firefighters — about 2,700 on peak days — was higher and created a higher potential for property loss because of the stay-behinds.
That is because the amount of firefighting equipment and personnel are limited resources, and when nearly a dozen other fires are burning in California, fire managers are in competition for all those engines and aircraft and people. During a busy fire season, they might not get everything they request.
The danger comes when equipment and resources are maxed out for a specific fire. Fire crews will always put protection of people over protection of property, and that can leave less-populated areas that were fully evacuated less protected — and more likely to burn.
However, Opliger does not want to give the impression that people who stay behind are somehow guaranteeing that their parcels will get better fire protection. At some point, they will have to weigh the risk to firefighters.
"The managers are going to have to make difficult decisions when we get into the scenario," he said. "Do we risk those responders just to save civilians that elected not to leave?"
Aside from putting out scolding messages in the news and social media about the burdens that holdouts place on firefighters and the heightened risks to residents, fire managers and law enforcement can't really do much to make people leave who don't want to.
Opliger said one tactic that seems to be persuasive is for survivors of close calls to share their stories of how they regret staying behind.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.