Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Regulators look to tougher pollution rules for LA's ports

Officials say the facility regularly monitors for any potential source of radiation.
The Port of Los Angeles.
(
Port of Los Angeles
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 2:36
Regulators look to tougher pollution rules for LA's ports

Southern California has made progress over the years in its fight against air pollution, but the region still has some of the worst air in the country. And regulators say the area is now losing ground in the effort to meet tougher federal standards.

That’s why the South Coast Air Quality Management District will hold an all-day meeting in Diamond Bar Friday to consider new rules for two of the area’s biggest polluters: the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. 

But the ports are saying, not so fast. 

Southern California’s ports attract legions of oceangoing ships, trains that move containers, and diesel-burning trucks. They all cross international or state lines.  In most cases local regulators don’t have direct jurisdiction over these polluters, says Adrian Martinez, a lawyer with the Natural Resources Defense Council.

"However, the [federal] Clean Air Act provides authority for local governments to basically put kind of a bubble on the port and say you need to make sure that you’re reducing the pollution for everything that comes in," says Martinez.

 Now regional regulators may decide to do exactly that. Such a move would mean the ports could be held liable for failing to meet their goals for cutting sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and soot pollution.

The ports say they can clean up their air on their own. As proof, they point to more than a dozen measures enacted under their six-year old Clean Air Action Plan. One success is a program to get ships to slow down, says Bob Kanter, director of environmental policy for the port of Long Beach.

Sponsored message

"The ports offered cash incentives to slow down, burn less fuel, put out less air pollution," says Kanter. "We had over 94% participation voluntarily in this program, which is huge."

An even bigger part of the plan is the Clean Trucks Program, that has stopped the oldest, dirtiest diesel rigs from serving the ports. Kanter argues that these and other pollution cutting measures worked because they were voluntary. New regulation, he says, would change how companies view calling at southern California ports. 

"I’m telling you, it sends a chill," he argues. "When they’re already looking at the two most heavily regulated ports, throwing another layer of regulation is really a bad message to business. And what we’ve already seen is with new opportunities these companies are going elsewhere."

But Adrian Martinez of the NRDC points out that since approving the Clean Air Action Plan, the ports have also approved billions of dollars in expansion.

"There’s a lot of construction happening. They’re expanding their operations, which means that you’re going to have more containers and ultimately could mean more pollution," says Martinez.

The ports are trying to negotiate a last-minute deal to avoid the new regulation. But that’s a tough sell. In recent years, the South Coast Air Quality Management District has regulated even the smallest polluters in the region to try to meet increasingly-strict federal rules. That includes charbroilers at restaurants, portable generators, and fireplaces, notes Elaine Chang,  a senior official with the SCAQMD. 

"There’s a fairness issue, right?" she says. "Everybody has to do [his] fair share."

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today