Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

ACLU sues Orange County Sheriff and DA over jailhouse snitch scandal

File: Orange County district attorney Tony Rackauckas delivers his rebuttal closing argument in the trial of two former Fullerton police officers who were facing charges related to the death of Kelly Thomas, a homeless man, who died after a violent 2011 confrontation with the then officers.
File: Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas delivers his rebuttal closing argument in a 2014 trial. The ACLU is suing Rackauckas and OC Sheriff Sandra Hutchens for their departments' alleged misuse of jailhouse informants and failure to turn over evidence to criminal defendants.
(
Joshua Sudock/Pool Photo
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

The ACLU of Southern California filed a lawsuit Wednesday against the Orange County's district attorney and sheriff for allegedly violating the rights of criminal defendants by misusing jailhouse informants to secure convictions.

The back story

The unlawful use of informants, or “snitches,” has led to sentences being overturned or lessened in more than a dozen cases, most notably in that of mass murderer Scott Dekraai.

Dekraai had confessed to killing eight people at a Seal Beach salon in 2011, but his sentencing was delayed for years as evidence mounted that sheriff’s deputies had improperly used a jailhouse informant to solicit information from Dekraai, and prosecutors failed to turn over evidence to the defense. Dekraai was sentenced last year to life in prison, rather than death, which prosecutors had sought. 

What does the ACLU want?

The civil rights group seeks a permanent injunction requiring the Sheriff’s Department and OCDA to create and maintain a comprehensive database of information on the use of jailhouse informants.

The ACLU also wants a judge to force OC law enforcement to notify any individuals whose criminal defense cases may have been compromised by the illegal use of informants so that they can decide whether to seek a remedy. 

Sponsored message

What's at stake?

OC District Attorney Tony Rackauckas is up for re-election this year. OC Sheriff Sandra Hutchens is retiring and has endorsed her second-in-command, Undersheriff Don Barnes, to replace her. 

The ACLU alleges in its lawsuit that Rackauckas and Hutchens “have needlessly compromised meritorious prosecutions and denied individuals who are innocent until proven guilty the evidence needed to defend themselves.” 

Rackauckas defended his office's legal use of informants in a statement Wednesday morning, saying it "will continue to lawfully use all evidence lawfully developed by local law enforcement and continue on our Mission, which is 'to enhance public safety and welfare and create a sense of security in the community through the vigorous enforcement of criminal and civil laws in a just, honest, efficient, and ethical manner.'"

He also said his office has not yet been served with the suit. 

Who else has looked into the controversy?

The ACLU lawsuit follows open investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice and the California Attorney General’s office into the use of jailhouse informants in Orange County and potential violation of defendants' constitutional rights. 

Sponsored message

An Orange County Grand Jury concluded last year that the Sheriff’s Department and District Attorney’s office had not conspired to illegally use jailhouse informants, and that the misuse of snitches was "the work of a few rogue deputies."

Read the complaint

 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right