Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Man paralyzed in LAPD shooting gets $5.7 million one decade later

More than 10 years after LAPD officers shot him in the back leaving him paralyzed, Robert Contreras will receive compensation from the City of L.A.
The Los Angeles City Council Wednesday gave final approval to a jury-awarded payout of $5.7 million to Contreras. Including interest and attorneys fees, the total will amount to $6.9 million, the city attorney's office said.
“We are so happy because this is going to make a huge difference in his life and in his family’s life,” said Dale Galipo, the lead attorney in Contreras’ case.
Payouts of this size are rare — just one LAPD shooting has led to larger settlement in recent years, according to data obtained by KPCC from the L.A. City Attorney. That was a $15 million payout to a 13 year-old who was shot by police in Glassell Park in 2010.
Overall, from fiscal years 2004 through 2015, LAPD-related settlements covering everything from wrongful death to traffic accidents have cost the city more than $320 million—more than $40 million of that from claims involving dozens of LAPD shootings, 22 of them fatal.
Closure for Contreras comes after years of legal wrangling over whether officers were in the right when they shot Contreras in the back in September 2005 as he fled the scene of a drive-by shooting.
Contreras was 19 at the time and a gang member. He was in a van in South L.A. with two other men when witnesses told police that gunfire had come from the van into the street. After a short pursuit, the three men got out of the vehicle and police chased them on foot. Police followed Contreras down a dark driveway and shot him four times.
Officers believed he had a gun, but Contreras was in fact, unarmed.
The bullet wounds left Contreras paralyzed from the waist down with just partial use of his arms.
In 2009, Contreras was convicted on attempted murder charges for his involvement in the drive-by shooting. He served time in prison, but after being released on parole, he filed a lawsuit in 2011 against the city and the two officers involved, saying the officers had used excessive force when they fired at him.
In 2012, the Los Angeles City Council had the chance to settle the case out of court for $4.5 million, but opted instead to take the case before a jury.
At the time, City Councilman Paul Krekorian told KPCC, “It’s really a question of trying to do what’s right in pursuing justice and to stand up for the officers who put their lives at risk.”
The city argued in court that the officers’ use of force was reasonable because Contreras was involved in a violent felony moments before he was shot, and was attempting to flee the scene. The city said the officers believed their lives were at risk because they believed Contreras was armed.
Contreras’ lawyers pointed out that he was shot in the back, so he could not have been facing the officers aggressively, as they claimed. Contreras’ lawyers also said the officers never warned Contreras that they were going to shoot.
The L.A. District Attorney declined to file criminal charges against the officers.
A jury awarded Contreras $5.7 million and the city appealed the decision, taking the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in December 2015.
The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal, so the award decided in lower courts held.
“In terms of jury award, there are no further levels of appeal of the underlying case, so there’s nowhere left for [the city of Los Angeles] to go,” said Bill Schmidt, one of the attorneys representing Contreras.
Schmidt said Contreras needs 24-hour care and has been getting by with help from his family and public assistance.
“It’s been a struggle for the family. [Contreras] hasn’t seen one cent from the award,” Schmidt said.
The city attorney’s office declined to comment for this story. Galipo said he expects Contreras to receive his money within 90 days.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.