Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

5 things to watch for in the Kuehl-Shriver Board of Supervisors debate

Candidates Bobby Shriver and Sheila Kuehl are two Santa Monica residents running against each other for the Board of Supervisors.
Candidates Bobby Shriver and Sheila Kuehl are two Santa Monica residents running against each other for the Board of Supervisors.
(
Shriver Campaign/Kuehl Campaign
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 0:42
5 things to watch for in the Kuehl-Shriver Board of Supervisors debate

Former Santa Monica Mayor Bobby Shriver, the nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy, faces former State Senator Sheila Kuehl Tuesday night in their first one-on-one debate since the June primary election. They are competing to replace Zev Yaroslavasky on the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.

The powerful five-member board controls funding for everything from public health to the Sheriff's Department. Both candidates want to represent the sprawling Third Supervisorial District, which includes Santa Monica, Beverly Hills and most of the San Fernando Valley.

Shriver, 60, and Kuehl, 73, are both Democrats – the race is non-partisan.  Kuehl edged Shriver in the primary, 36-29 percent, but the election is expected to be close. The focus of the debate is transportation and economic development issues.

Here are five things to watch for:

  • Should there be an extension of the Measure R half-cent sales tax to fund transportation projects? Extending the tax would allow the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to borrow more money and speed projects. Whoever is elected will serve on the MTA board. A 2012 measure to extend the tax failed to garner the necessary two-thirds vote. Should the Board of Supervisors place another measure on the ballot?
  • Where do Shriver and Kuehl stand on the Century City subway, or Purple Line? Shriver has said he supports the route that sends the subway under a corner of Beverly Hills High School. The city of Beverly Hills sued to stop the project. Kuehl has said she opposes that route, but added she would not do anything to delay the project.
  • Businesses have expressed doubts about plans for a special property tax to fund a cleanup of storm water in the county. Some school districts and cities also oppose the idea, saying they don’t produce much pollution – so why should they pay? So where do Shriver and Kuehl stand on the idea of a property tax to clean polluted storm water? Do they have other ideas to fund a clean up?
  • Shriver and Kuehl have very different styles. Shriver tends to be animated. Kuehl is more cerebral. That could affect their debate styles and might inform voters on how each would perform on the five-member Board of Supervisors.
  • Where do Shriver and Kuehl stand on business regulations and public-private partnerships by the state’s largest county government? Most business groups have endorsed Shriver. Most labor unions have endorsed Kuehl. What will each candidate have to say about the interaction of the county with businesses, and the often- contentious issues of contracting out county services.

The two candidates present very different resumes. Shriver is a former Santa Monica mayor who has used his powerful political connections as a member of the Kennedy family to team with U2 rock star, Bono and raise money for worldwide causes including the fight against AIDS in Africa. Kuehl was a child actor who spent nearly two decades in the state legislature, championing healthcare and family leave legislation. She was the first openly gay member of the legislature and, if elected, would be the first openly gay member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right