Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.
Judge calls the Trump administration response to his order 'woefully insufficient'
The U.S. Supreme Court is shown March 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. A federal judge is asking the government for proof that it complied to his order in its deportation of more than 200 alleged Tren de Aragua gang members to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act of 1789.
(
Win McNamee
/
Getty Images
)
A federal judge on Thursday said the government provided a "woefully insufficient" response to his prior orders in a case over President Trump's use of wartime powers.
Judge James Boasberg had earlier asked the Trump administration to provide more details about weekend flights that deported hundreds of alleged Venezuelan gang members and other people to El Salvador — despite his order to turn the planes around. He sought more proof the government was complying with his temporary restraining order.
He asked the government to provide details about the flights, or explain why such details fall under "the state-secrets doctrine." This privilege would allow the government to refuse to provide evidence that a court requests because doing so could harm U.S. national security or foreign relations.
Boasberg initially gave a deadline on Wednesday, and then extended it mid-day on Thursday.
-
More immigrants are not showing up for their mandatory immigration court hearings compared to prior years, an NPR analysis shows. -
His policies are picking winners and losers — and blurring the lines between business and government. -
The Trump administration is suing to block a new California that would ban federal law enforcement officers from wearings masks on duty.
"In an ex parte pleading delivered shortly after today's deadline, the Government again evaded its obligations," Boasberg wrote on Thursday. An ex parte pleading means the filings went directly to the judge, without notifying the other parties in the case.
He said the government only provided a six-paragraph declaration from a regional official in Immigration and Customs Enforcement that repeated information shared previously, and added that: "Cabinet Secretaries are currently actively considering whether to invoke the state secrets privilege over the other facts requested by the Court's order. Doing so is a serious matter that requires careful consideration of national security and foreign relations, and it cannot properly be undertaken in just 24 hours."
Sponsored message
Boasberg called this response "woefully insufficient."
"To begin, the Government cannot proffer a regional ICE official to attest to Cabinet-level discussions of the state-secrets privilege; indeed, his declaration on that point, not surprisingly, is based solely on his unsubstantiated 'understand[ing],'" he wrote.
The judge reset the deadlines in the case, asking the government to explain by 10 a.m. on Friday about any discussions regarding invoking the privilege of state secrets, and to decide whether to invoke such privilege by March 25.
A spokesperson for the Department of Justice in a statement said "The Department of Justice continues to believe that the court's superfluous questioning of sensitive national security information is inappropriate judicial overreach."
Trump had earlier called for Boasberg's impeachment, and called him a "lunatic" in an interview with Fox News.
— NPR's Ryan Lucas contributed to this story.
Copyright 2025 NPR
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
