Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Housing & Homelessness

LA mayor bans duplexes in Palisades burn zone after getting permission from governor

The burned shell of a home hovers on a hit over an empty street.
Sunset Boulevard House, also known as The Bridges House by architect Robert Bridges, was destroyed by the Palisades fire on Wednesday.
(
Brian van der Brug
/
Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Duplexes can no longer replace single-family houses in the Pacific Palisades as rebuilding begins for the more than 5,000 homes destroyed by the January fire.

On Wednesday, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass ordered a ban on duplex projects in the Palisades. The move came after an order the same day from Gov. Gavin Newsom that granted local governments permission to suspend a state housing density law in burn zones.

The law at play, Senate Bill 9, allows single-family homeowners across the state to build duplexes and split their lots, potentially creating up to four units of housing on land previously zoned for one unit.

In the city of L.A., 72% of residential land is zoned for single-family homes.

In a statement Wednesday, Bass said: “SB 9 was not originally intended to be used in the rebuilding of a community that was decimated by the worst natural disaster L.A. has ever seen.”

Duplexes seen as threat to safety, neighborhood character

Bass thanked Newsom for his executive order giving local governments the option to suspend SB 9 in zones where the severity of fire hazard is very high. The governor’s order applies to the Palisades, Sunset Mesa, Malibu and the eastern foothills of Altadena.

Sponsored message
More on housing

“This executive order responds directly to requests from local officials and community feedback, recognizing the need for local discretion in recovery and that not all laws are designed for rebuilding entire communities destroyed by fires overnight,” Newsom said in a statement.

The exemptions come after Palisades residents, along with their city councilmember, Traci Park, pushed state and local leaders to cancel the application of SB 9 in their neighborhood.

They said increased population would make evacuations even more difficult during emergencies, and multi-family buildings would threaten the neighborhood’s “quiet, low-density” character.

How a handful of applications led to a social media uproar

A spokesperson for the Mayor’s Office said the city has received seven SB 9 applications in the Palisades since January. L.A. officials did not specify how many new units those applications sought to create.

Six months after the fires, L.A. had received about 400 rebuilding applications in the Palisades. SB 9 projects represent less than 2% of those applications.

Sponsored message
Trending on LAist

Despite the relatively low number of SB 9 projects, homeowner groups and social media influencers have urged elected officials to stop what they see as “opportunistic developers” building unsafe, dense housing along the neighborhood’s narrow, winding streets.

“On one single-family lot, there could be up to eight to 12 new cars on a street that fire trucks couldn’t even fit on,” said reality TV personality Spencer Pratt in a recent TikTok video.

Since Pratt and his family lost their home in the Palisades Fire, he has become an outspoken critic of how Newsom and other California officials have responded to the disaster.

Pratt said in his TikTok video: “Everyone, message Newsom, Karen Bass and Senator Ben Allen and tell them: stop SB 9 in the Palisades immediately.”

Supporters of SB 9 had hoped the law would give displaced Palisades renters a few more options for returning to the high-cost neighborhood. They noted that because of the law’s owner-occupancy requirements, only homeowners who planned to live on the property for at least three years were allowed to split their lots.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right