With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
The annual max increase for LA's rent controlled apartments is back — as city puts off vote to reform rules

Topline:
Starting Tuesday, rent increases for most apartment dwellers in Los Angeles will be capped at 3% — or up to 5% if utilities are included. The new limits are taking effect at a time when the L.A. City Council continues to put off voting on a plan to update the city’s decades-old rent control formula.
Who’s covered: The city’s rent control caps generally apply to tenants living in apartments built before October 1978. These older units make up about two-thirds of all L.A. apartments. Tenants in these apartments can now have their rent increased by up to 3% — unless landlords also cover the tenant’s gas and electricity bills, in which case another 1% can be added for each utility, bringing the maximum allowable increase to 5%.
What’s new: The new rent hike caps are slightly down from the previous limits, which ran from 4% to 6%. Trends in local inflation determine how high landlords can raise rents. With inflation steadily declining in recent months, so too are the city’s allowable rent increases. The new 3% to 5% cap is set to remain in place through June 30, 2026.
Why no reforms yet? The city’s Housing Department has recommended getting rid of the additional 2% utilities bump, citing an economic report which found the surcharge unfairly increases costs on tenants. City housing officials have also recommended changes to how allowable increases are calculated. Those changes would have capped rent hikes at 2% on Tuesday. The current maximum of 5% is taking effect because the L.A. City Council has yet to schedule a vote on the proposed reforms.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.