With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA city planners hear from a chorus of Angelenos wanting more housing in single-family neighborhoods

Los Angeles city planners held a virtual meeting Thursday night to gather public feedback on their plans for meeting ambitious housing production goals. Dozens of speakers repeated the same refrain throughout the evening: allow new apartments in single-family neighborhoods.
The L.A. Planning Department has outlined a blueprint for achieving a state-mandated housing goal of nearly 457,000 new homes by 2029. Officials say the city can get there by essentially doubling down on development in already dense areas by offering incentives to builders.
Doing so would be critical under the current plan because it leaves out the 72% of residential land in L.A. zoned for single-family homes. That approach has pleased homeowner groups, but spurred criticism from renter advocates, homeless service providers and affordable housing developers.
Calls for a new approach
Thursday’s meeting was primarily focused on public input. Most speakers urged the city to reverse course and provide more opportunities to build up single-family neighborhoods.
One wealthy family can come in and build a mini-mansion that’s 4,000 square feet. But God forbid four families move into four 1,000 square foot places.
“We live in the second largest city in the country, with so much economic opportunity, and yet we are landlocking 75% of our residentially zoned land for exclusively wealthy people,” said Kiersten Stanley of Studio City. “One wealthy family can come in and build a mini-mansion that’s 4,000 square feet. But God forbid four families move into four 1,000 square foot places.”
Many speakers described the decision to exempt single-family neighborhoods as an issue of racial and economic justice. Some pointed out that erecting barriers around areas that remain wealthy and exclusive today perpetuates the legacy of redlining and other zoning restrictions that had racist origins.
“Historically it has been established to exclude people of color from predominantly white neighborhoods,” said Andres Perkins. “This drove a lot of unequal access to housing, education and jobs. Continuing that will further that segregation we’re trying to move past.”
Some homeowners support city’s plan
A smaller number of homeowners attended the meeting to speak in support of leaving single-family neighborhoods alone. They argued new housing belongs on the city’s dense main thoroughfares, where they said apartments will be closer to transit lines and businesses.
“There’s simply no reason to wreck these neighborhoods with random density until we’ve built out our corridors closer to our commercial districts,” said Tracy Thrower Conyers with the group Concerned for Westchester/Playa Del Rey.
“I often hear groups like the one I represent called NIMBYs,” she said. “It’s unfortunate that local planning has been reduced to pejorative name-calling.”
What happens now
Planning officials said no immediate decisions would be made on amending the plans. They said feedback during the meeting would help inform revised drafts, which will first go to the city Planning Commission before heading to the L.A. City Council for a final vote by February 2025.
City planners had originally considered allowing more density in single-family zones. They later dropped the idea “based on feedback we received during our department’s outreach, as well as direction from the Los Angeles city council,” senior city planner Blair Smith said during the meeting.
“That said, we’re looking for your feedback today and we appreciate all the folks who’ve come out here today to share their perspective related to single-family,” Smith said. “We’re very much in a listening phase.”
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.