With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA City Council votes to address homelessness data problems
The downtown L.A. skyline at dusk as seen from Skid Row.
(
Ethan Ward
/
LAist
)
The Los Angeles City Council voted Tuesday to address inconsistent and fragmented data issues within the city’s homeless services system.
The vote directs the city’s chief legislative analyst to find data silos and databases that may have a connection to homelessness but aren’t included in the Homeless Management Information System — a regional database service providers use to track people experiencing homelessness.
City officials will also report back on which programs could be linked to the database and shared with the county, as well as which city agencies should be responsible for managing those efforts. No deadline was set for the report back.
The council approved the motion 14 to 0, with Councilmember Adrin Nazarian absent.
Sponsored message
-
California is under pressure to embrace more temporary homeless shelters that require sobriety, at the potential expense of long-term housing. -
A committee tasked with oversight of the city’s controversial tax said it has created 10,000 union construction jobs. LAist tracked down the claim’s origins. -
Residents compiled testing results for 50 remediated homes. One third still contained asbestos, and 63% contained elevated levels of lead. What does that mean for safety?
The backstory
Accurate data has been a sore spot for the city of L.A. and the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, the region’s top homelessness agency.
The city has struggled to track its progress addressing homelessness due to ongoing issues. A recent independent audit, commissioned by a federal judge, found that city officials have made it impossible to accurately track spending in part due to a lack of uniform data standards at LAHSA, which is overseen by the city and county. LAist has also found and reported on major errors in city data.
The City Council motion that council members voted on described the problems as the city losing a “vital ability” to improve services and maximize what it’s paying for.
The motion, authored by Councilmember Nithya Raman, stated that collecting and analyzing data from across city departments helps make sure resources and services are directed to the Angelenos who need them most.
“[D]epartments really do need to talk to each other if we're gonna make sure our money does what it's supposed to be doing,” Raman said during a Housing and Homelessness Committee meeting last week.
Sponsored message
What’s next
The federal judge who commissioned the audit is considering handing control of L.A. city homelessness spending to a court-appointed receiver. A days-long hearing is set to start next Tuesday to gather evidence on whether the city has breached its obligations to create more shelter.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
