Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen

Share This

Housing and Homelessness

LA City Attorney Says She Made A ‘Mistake’ Handling Skid Row Housing Trust Takeover

City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto, a woman with light skin tone, straight brown hair, wearing a blue blazer stands at a podium and speaks into a microphone. Behind her is Mark Adams, a man with light skin tone, white hair, wearing a navy blue blazer, white shirt, and light blue tie. He stands in front of two flags.
City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto announcing that the City of L.A. is going to preserve and rehabilitate 2,000 units of permanent supportive housing owned by the Skid Row Housing Trust. Mark Adams is on the right side of the photo.
(
LA CityView35 on YouTube (screenshot)
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today. 

L.A. city leaders are moving forward with a push to remove the man they put in charge of housing for 1,500 vulnerable people who used to be unhoused, after the city attorney cited a series of problems – including people being wrongfully told they’re getting evicted – that led to a breakdown in trust.

The move won unanimous support from the full city council on Tuesday, following a 15-minute closed-door discussion.

At the budget committee meeting the previous day, City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto rattled off a series of what she cast as violations of trust by Mark Adams, whom she had previously asked a judge to appoint to take control of the financially imploding Skid Row Housing Trust properties in early April.

Putting Adams in charge was a mistake, she said. It was a rare public admission of a judgment error by an elected official.

Support for LAist comes from

“It's very difficult to come and admit a mistake. But I do think that part of our jobs is that if there's a mistake, to correct it,” Feldstein Soto said.

“I'm here to do that today to the best of my ability.”

The council is now fully backing her recommendation to have the city offer a $10 million low-interest loan to fix the properties if the judge replaces Adams with another receiver named Kevin Singer.

Adams, in turn, is asking the judge to keep him in charge and order the city to still loan the $10 million, saying the receivership is in a dire situation because of a lack of cash.

In a Monday court filing, he said the city has had the ability to loan that money all along and “could have made it available to [Adams] but chose not to.”

The budget committee voted unanimously 3-0 Monday to support Feldstein Soto's recommendation. Two council members were absent.

Support for LAist comes from

Adams defends his progress

In a statement on Monday, a spokesperson for Adams’ company defended his progress with the properties that struggled for years under “bureaucratic neglect.”

“It is a challenging project beyond the scope of what was expected,” said the statement, adding that the judge recently expressed support for him.

WHAT IS A RECEIVER?
  • A receiver is someone appointed by a court to take control of a property and fix problems. They essentially become the landlord, with oversight by a judge and the city. The Skid Row Housing Trust case is by far the city’s largest court-appointed receivership in the history of L.A., according to the city attorney.

“Mr. Adams is still by far the most qualified person to make the [Skid Row Housing Trust] a safe, sustainable, and thriving community once all the hard work is completed after years of neglect by the prior administration,” the statement adds.

Adams’ most egregious violation, the city attorney said at Monday's committee meeting, were eviction notices that were wrongfully sent to 451 tenants by the property management company he hired.

Feldstein Soto took direct aim at Adam’s description of the eviction notices as a mistake or “flub.”

Support for LAist comes from

“While it has been explained as an oversight and a mistake, that kind of error visited upon people who are incredibly vulnerable — who have no place to turn, and who show up at their door and are faced with a three-day notice to quit or pay rent — is completely unacceptable,” Feldstein Soto told council members at Monday’s meeting. “Especially from a court officer who promised that no one would be evicted for the nonpayment of rent.”

Adams told LAist earlier this month that the eviction notices were rescinded, and that he warned his subcontractor not to do it again or he’d fire them.

The city attorney also said the plan with Adams was to get 500 apartments repaired within three to six months, so they can start receiving government rent subsidies again and make the buildings financially sustainable. She said the pace of repairs was “not acceptable” and fewer than 10% have been fixed since Adams was put in charge in early April.

Councilmembers speak out

During the meeting, Councilmember Bob Blumenfield said the city has to intervene to protect the safety of the 1,500 people who live in the trust’s buildings.

“It's a humanitarian crisis that we know at the end of the day falls on our lap as a city — even though the crisis is not our doing,” he said. “But we need to be aware of it and we need to step up.”

“I don't see how we cannot do this,” added Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky.

Support for LAist comes from

“We don't have a lot of options.”

It’s ultimately up to a judge to decide whether to replace Adams. But city officials are trying to incentivize that by making the loan dependent on putting Singer in charge.

Updated June 27, 2023 at 1:06 PM PDT
This story was updated following a vote by the L.A. City Council on Tuesday.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist