With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA agrees to pay nearly $5 million for big law firm in homelessness lawsuit

The Los Angeles City Council has agreed to pay millions more to a big law firm representing the city in a long-running federal legal settlement over the city’s response to the region’s homelessness crisis. The move comes despite some members’ concerns about the ballooning budget.
Why it matters
The city agreed in May to pay $900,000 to Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher for an initial two-year contract. Then the city blew through that budget in just a few days.
The law firm billed the city about $1.8 million for two weeks of work, according to a May invoice LAist obtained through a public records request.
Altogether, the city has been invoiced for $3.2 million as of Aug. 8, according to a memo written by L.A. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto and obtained by the L.A. Times. LAist filed a public records request on Aug. 8 for the firm’s invoices starting in June, but still has not received those records from the City Attorney’s Office.
Why now
At the recommendation of the Budget and Finance Committee, the L.A. City Council agreed to amend the contract to increase funding for the firm to nearly $5 million through June 2026.
The vote on Wednesday was 10-3, with Councilmembers Nithya Raman, Adrin Nazarian and Tim McOsker against it. Councilmembers Bob Blumenfield and Monica Rodriguez were absent for the full council vote.
McOsker also voted against the Budget and Finance recommendation during the committee meeting on Tuesday.
The backstory
The City Council initially delayed the decision to increase the budget, sending the city attorney’s request to the Budget and Finance Committee a few weeks ago for further consideration.
Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky, who chairs the committee, said in a previous statement to LAist that she and her colleagues want to address the cost “in a way that protects taxpayers and establishes a thoughtful, long-term strategy for managing outside legal expenses.”
Yaroslavsky said the committee “ came up with what we thought was a reasonable solution” during Wednesday’s council meeting.
What's next
The firm has continued to work on the case for the city, including during a downtown L.A. hearing on Tuesday. The city is appealing a federal judge’s ruling that found officials failed in multiple ways to follow a settlement agreement to create more shelter for unhoused people.
Go deeper … for more about the firm and how we got here.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.
-
More than half of sales through September have been to corporate developers. Grassroots community efforts continue to work to combat the trend.
-
The bill would increase penalties for metal recyclers who possess or purchase metal used in public infrastructure.