With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Judge holds new hearing as he considers yanking control of homelessness spending from LA's elected leaders

A federal court hearing with potentially far-reaching ramifications kicked off Thursday as a judge weighs whether to seize control of L.A. city homelessness spending and hand it over to a court-appointed receiver.
Why it matters
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit are asking U.S. District Judge David O. Carter to find the city in breach of its obligations to create more shelter and to hand control of spending to a receiver. The city objects to the idea, writing in court filings that its due process rights are being violated because it has not been given enough time to respond.
Carter also has been pushing for a new audit into where taxpayer money went for homelessness programs, including Inside Safe, which L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and the city attorney pushed back on. Carter has said he would take “drastic” measures if city officials didn’t agree to the audit.
The backstory
A recent, independent court-ordered audit found major failures by the city in tracking more than $2 billion of homelessness spending. Much of those funds flowed through the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, otherwise known as LAHSA. Auditors found inconsistent data and a lack of oversight for service providers.
L.A. County has since planned to pull more than $300 million out of the agency and into a new county-controlled department. The L.A. City Council voted unanimously to explore a similar departure a week later.
Why now
Carter has continually criticized a lack of transparency and accountability at LAHSA, including for the recent point-in-time homeless count. The agency released incomplete data months earlier than expected, which Carter called “political gamesmanship” and expressed skepticism about the accuracy of the results.
He also ordered LAHSA to give an update during Thursday’s hearing on how much of the roughly $50 million in cash advances paid to service providers the agency has been able to recover.
Who’s who
In orders, the judge has repeatedly asked city, county and state officials — including Gov. Gavin Newsom, Bass and outgoing LAHSA CEO Va Lecia Adams Kellum — to attend Thursday’s hearing.
But Bass and L.A. City Council President Marqueece Harris Dawson will not be there, according to a filing the city submitted Tuesday. City officials were lambasted by Carter for failing to properly track billions of homelessness spending at the most recent hearing in March.
How to observe
The hearing starts at 9 a.m. Thursday in Courtroom 1 at the First Street Federal Courthouse in downtown L.A.
What’s next
This week, Carter set another hearing for May 27 to gather evidence about whether the city violated two major agreements in the lawsuit to create new shelter beds, known as the Roadmap agreement and the L.A. Alliance settlement.
The L.A. Alliance, a downtown business group, alleges that city officials falsely told the court they created nearly 2,300 new housing units when they “unequivocally did not.”
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.