Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Housing & Homelessness

Judge orders LA to pump the brakes on rollout of new RV law

A view from the sidewalk of a city street lined with RVs and parked cars. The RVs are in various states of disrepair, including discolored paint.
RVs and a homeless encampment in the city of Los Angeles.
(
Allen J. Schaben
/
Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
)

Topline:

A judge has ordered the city of Los Angeles not to move forward with a program that would allow local officials to remove and dismantle more recreational vehicles the city deems a nuisance.

Either that, or explain to the court at a hearing next month why the city hasn’t done so, the judge said.

Why it matters: The city had planned to implement a new state law that gives L.A. County authority to dispose of abandoned or inoperable RVs worth up to $4,000.

But the court order, issued Tuesday by Superior Court Judge Curtis A. Kin, puts that on pause and holds L.A. to a previous law that allowed the city to dispose of RVs worth $500 or less.

The backstory: The order stems from a legal challenge by a coalition of housed and unhoused residents in West L.A. who argue Assembly Bill 630, which became law Jan. 1, gives the authority for expanded RV enforcement only to the county of Los Angeles — not the city.

The L.A. City Council voted in December to approve a motion instructing various city departments to “immediately implement” the law.

The CD11 Coalition for Human Rights asked a judge to intervene, claiming L.A. is “recklessly charging ahead” with a program it’s not authorized to execute, according to court documents.

Sponsored message

What officials say: Councilmember Traci Park, who introduced the council motion in October, told LAist previously that the city needs to have tools to get unsafe and unsanitary RVs off public streets for good.

“These vehicles create unacceptable health, environmental, and safety risks, putting entire neighborhoods, critical infrastructure, and sensitive environmental areas at risk,” Park, who represents communities including Venice and Mar Vista, said in a statement. “Residents want solutions, not ideological wars, delay tactics, and frivolous lawsuits.”

City Attorney Hydee Feldstein-Soto’s office did not respond to LAist’s multiple requests for comment on the city’s implementation of AB 630.

Mayor Karen Bass proposed AB 630 in partnership with Assemblymember Mark González, who introduced the California assembly bill. González said in a statement to LAist Wednesday that his office is “working with our partners to clarify the law to ensure the City can fully implement AB 630."

In response to questions from LAist, Bass’ office said in a statement that previous law required inoperable RVs to be put up for auction, which often led to them winding up back on the streets.

“For too long, bad actors have preyed on unhoused Angelenos and families through a cycle of buying and auctioning off broken down, inoperable RVs that are dangerous for those inhabiting them and for surrounding areas — they catch on fire and can become death traps, not the type of RVs safe to be used for housing," the statement read.

LAist also reached out to City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo, whose office is involved with coordinating the removal of RVs from L.A. streets.
Szabo deferred questions about AB 630 to the City Attorney's Office.

Sponsored message

What's next: A hearing is set for Feb. 19 at 1:30 p.m. in L.A. County Superior Court.

Go deeper: West LA coalition challenges city's rollout of new RV law

Updated January 15, 2026 at 10:11 AM PST

This story has been updated with a comment from L.A. Mayor Karen Bass' office.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today