Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

Housing and Homelessness

City Of LA Can't Discard 'Bulky' Possessions Of Unhoused People

People hand an ottoman over to a man wearing a face mask with sanitation trucks in the background.
Activists and workers help a person experiencing homelessness move his possessions so they are not removed during a sweep in Harbor City in January.
(
Patrick T. Fallon
/
AFP via Getty Images
)

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

Beds, couches and other bulky items can't be confiscated from the sidewalks of Los Angeles under a ruling by a panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

At issue is a city ordinance that strictly limits what individuals can store in public areas. A provision allows L.A. police and sanitation workers to seize and discard — without notice — any item too large to fit into a 60-gallon container. One key exception: items used as shelter.

Unhoused people and their advocates sued in 2019, claiming the policy violates 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable seizures.

U.S. District Judge Dale S. Fischer agreed last April, saying the size of the item wasn’t enough to warrant removal. And now, this week, two of the three judges hearing the appeal also agreed.

Support for LAist comes from

U.S. Circuit Judge Michelle T. Friedland and U.S. District Judge David A. Ezra cited a ruling in a previous case that barred L.A. from summarily destroying homeless people's property in public spaces.

"We agree with the district court that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their claim that this provision, on its face, violates the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable seizures," they wrote in the opinion released Thursday.

The judge who disagreed, U.S Circuit Judge Mark J. Bennett, said that removing bulky items is lawful. He suggested that portion of the provision should be separated from disposal of property and reviewed separately.

The majority did say the city is free to draft a lawful version of the Bulky Items Provision. Which, according to the ruling, states:

No Person shall Store any Bulky Item in a Public Area. Without prior notice, the City may remove and may discard any Bulky Item, whether Attended or Unattended, Stored in a Public Area unless the Bulky Item is designed to be used as a shelter. For any Bulky Item that is designed to be used as a shelter but does not constitute a Tent as defined in Subsection 2(q), with pre-removal notice as specified in Subsection 4(a), the City may remove and discard the Bulky Item, whether Attended or Unattended. If the Bulky Item violates Subsection 3(d)–(h) herein, even if it is designed to be used as a shelter, without prior notice, the City may remove and discard the Bulky Item, whether Attended or Unattended. L.A., Cal., Mun. Code § 56.11(3)(i) (2016).

“Bulky Items” are defined as, any item "with the exception of a constructed tent":

  • operational bicycle or operational walker
  • crutch or wheelchair that is too large to fit into a 60-gallon container
  • including, but not limited to, a shed, structure, mattress, couch, chair, other furniture or appliance.

The City Attorney's office says it's reviewing its options.

Support for LAist comes from

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist