Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Health

From 'Fighting Cancer' to 'Losing The Battle,' We Understand Illness As War. Some Say It's Time For A Change

Two red boxing gloves jut out of the top of two faces in profile
A cancer patient gets chemotherapy.
(
VectorInspiration/Getty Images
/
iStockphoto
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 10:58
Rethinking The ‘War on Cancer’ And Our Cultural Dictionary For Disease And Illness

Words of battle are embedded deeply in our discourse about illness.

In 1971, President Richard Nixon famously declared a "war on cancer.” And people often resolve to be fighters, to do everything they can to avoid losing their battle in the face of a life-threatening diagnosis.

For Dr. Sunita Puri, this language is familiar. But she says that in her experience working with patients, these words can obscure the reality of each person’s experience of disease.

Puri, the director of the hospice and palliative medicine fellowship at the University of Massachusetts and author of the memoir "That Good Night: Life and Medicine in the Eleventh Hour," joined LAist’s public affairs show AirTalk, which airs on 89.3 FM, to discuss how language can affect how we understand our bodies and their limitations.

Sponsored message

Why word choice matters

Puri says that these combative phrases are not very meaningful in a medical sense. But, she says, doctors don’t always ask patients what they mean when they use these words, or what, exactly, they are fighting for. Without a frank discussion, these abstract words end up serving as proxies for major medical decisions.

“When I was in my residency, if a patient told me that they were a fighter, then my assumption was that they would want to go through any and all treatments," she says, "no matter what the cost to their dignity and their suffering and their quality of life."

Assuming someone means treatment no matter the repercussion can mean other important conversations — like about the full range of options for care, or about what they want their life to look like — fall to the wayside.

Puri says using fighting words creates a dichotomy of winning and losing and also puts great emphasis on personal strength. Sometimes, patients might feel like they are not fighting hard enough, or that their will to live is not strong enough, if they are too fatigued or in too much pain to get out of bed.

“But strength of spirit is not the same as strength of the body,” Puri says. “So much of what happens with cancer and other illnesses is that your body reaches a limit, and it might be your body that can't fight anymore.”

Sponsored message

How to have more compassionate conversation

Puri says it’s important for doctors to help their patients feel comfortable enough to be vulnerable about how they are truly feeling, and what they want out of treatment.

“What I wish we could also talk about is the concepts of suffering and dignity. Because those are things that are absent largely from discussions about what it means to be sick, what it means to be alive,” she says.

And that's where language can make a difference.

“If we reintroduce a softer and more compassionate, humanistic vocabulary to these discussions," she says, "then I think we can actually help people to understand that fighting at all costs, may not actually be what they really mean when they’re telling us that they're fighters.”

Listen to the conversation

Listen 10:58
Rethinking The ‘War on Cancer’ And Our Cultural Dictionary For Disease And Illness
Sponsored message

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right