With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
CARE Court Has Been Live For Weeks in LA and OC. How’s It Going?

It’s been several weeks since two of California’s most populous counties launched a new program aimed at getting more people living with serious mental illness into treatment.
Known as CARE Court, the new program allows family members, behavioral health workers, first responders and others to petition a court to step in with a voluntary care plan for someone living with serious mental illness, like schizophrenia.
Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state leaders have billed CARE Court as a way to get people the lifesaving treatment they need and as one tool for addressing California’s homelessness crisis.
Still, several groups including Disability Rights California and the American Civil Liberties Union have raised concerns that the program may be too coercive and could strip people of their rights to make their own decisions.
So how are things going?
L.A. County
Los Angeles County launched its CARE Court on Dec. 1. The Department of Mental Health reported that a total of 28 petitions were filed that month. A department spokesperson said the number of petitions filed in January is expected to increase significantly as authorities continue outreach after the holiday break.
So far, none of the petitions filed have reached the formal care agreement stage yet, which could take six weeks or more.
“DMH remains committed to providing all individuals entering through this process with services, even if they do not meet the eligibility for CARE or if their petitions have been dismissed,” H. Chung So, a spokesperson for the department, wrote in an email to LAist.
Judge Samantha Jessner, presiding judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, said all of the petitions filed in the county so far have come from family members of the person named in the documents.
That may not come as a surprise to many families who have rallied behind CARE Court since the beginning, seeing it as a way to have their concerns for loved ones heard and acted upon. Some have said they fear a court setting could scare people away from the program.
Jessner acknowledged those concerns and said it will be important to meet people where they are as CARE Court progresses.
“If that means you appear via an iPad from a place that you’re comfortable, that’s fine with us,” Jessner said. “And if that means you come into the courtroom and you are with a judge, and you develop an in-person sort of connection with the judge, that’s fine, too.”
It’s too early to identify trends or get a sense of how individuals are responding to the program, Jessner said, but she said she hopes she and her colleagues can help people who have been struggling.
“I think every judge in every courtroom in this county is called upon to help people,” Jessner said. “A CARE Court should be no different in achieving that goal of helping people that are in need of treatment and services... in a way that makes them feel empowered and in a way that makes them feel like they have some agency and say in the process.”
State officials touted CARE Court as a new tool to address homelessness but they also acknowledge its limitations. An estimated 2,000 people throughout California could be helped by CARE Court by the end of 2024, officials said.
The latest homeless count from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority found that 25% of the more than 75,000 unhoused people in L.A. County self-reported experiencing a severe mental illness.
A 2022 study by the California Policy Lab at UCLA showed that about 4,500 unhoused people in L.A. County who were unsheltered and received street outreach services between 2019 and 2020 had been diagnosed with a psychotic spectrum disorder, such as schizophrenia. That’s about 10% of the total 45,000 unsheltered people the study examined.
Orange County
Since CARE Court launched Oct. 2 in Orange County, 45 petitions were filed, 20 of which met the initial requirements, according to that county’s Department of Behavioral Health. As of this week, people in three of those petitions had been given court dates.
Veronica Kelley, the county’s behavioral health director, said that, from the day department authorities receive a petition, they have 14 days to find the person and serve them with paperwork to come to court.
“The timeline is very difficult to work with,” Kelley said, noting that the judge overseeing Orange County's CARE Court has granted extensions.
Kelley said the department has worked to build trust with people who might have been initially unreceptive to getting involved with the voluntary program.
“It’s a long process. Because imagine if I walked up to you on the street and just said, ‘Hey, your mom is worried about you so come with me we’re going to put you in a program.’ You’re not even going to talk to me,” Kelley said.
Kelley said she’s trying to manage expectations for the program, noting that once the public perceives it as a homelessness fix, it’s difficult to undo that perception. So far, about a third of the 45 petitions have been for unhoused people.
The program is not solely aimed at unhoused residents. Anyone who has untreated schizophrenia could qualify.
About half of the people in the cases Orange County have received have commercial insurance, according to Kelley. And some cases, she said, are getting dismissed because schizophrenia is not the primary diagnosis. That means that some people who have co-occurring substance use issues are being turned away from the program. But the department still offers treatment, even if CARE Court ends up not being the right fit, authorities said.
Kelley said she sees CARE Court as another way for county authorities to find people who might be slipping through the cracks and to get them to care providers.
“The upside is it does allow us to find out about people that we never would have known about,” Kelley said. “Because I can’t go to all 3.2 million people’s homes in this county and knock on their door and ask them if everyone is OK.”
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Tens of thousands of workers across Southern California walk out over pay and staffing issues.
-
People in and around recent burn scars should be alert to the risk of debris flows. Typical October weather will be back later this week.
-
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership says the cuts amount to 11% of the workforce.
-
The rock legend joins LAist for a lookback on his career — and the next chapter of his music.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.