Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Health

AG Bonta sues Children’s Hospital of OC’s parent company for ending gender-affirming care

Protesters on a street corner hold signs with slogans that include "Politicians should not make healthcare decisions," "Patients before politics" and "Trust doctors."
Trans health care advocates staged a rally on Jan. 24, 2026 outside Children's Hospital of Orange County to protest its decision to stop some gender-affirming treatments.
(
Kevin Tidmarsh/LAist
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit against the parent company of Children’s Hospital of Orange County for violating the terms of a recently signed merger agreement when it decided to cut off hormone therapy and other gender-affirming treatments to about 1,500 patients.

Last month, Rady Children’s Health announced the restrictions, which take effect Feb. 6. It pointed to recent federal actions in its decision.

The healthcare system said that it would still offer hormone replacement therapy to patients 19 and older. It would also and continue to see its patients 18 and under for treatments without hormones or surgeries.

Bonta’s lawsuit, however, alleges the hospital system broke an agreement it had signed with his office just a year ago. That contract guaranteed that it would continue offering the same level of care to its patients through 2034 in many divisions of health care, including gender-affirming care.

“Rady flagrantly disregarded its legal obligations by unilaterally deciding to preemptively comply with the Administration’s demands and cease medically necessary care for roughly 1,450 patients,” Bonta wrote in a statement.

Trending on LAist

What the lawsuit says

Bonta is seeking a permanent injunction that would require Rady to restore “all gender-affirming care services to the same types and levels of care as were provided at the time of Rady’s merger in January 2025” at CHOC. The injunction would also apply to Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego, and its other hospitals and clinics across Southern California.

Bonta also pointed to the long-term health effects and complications that would result from taking trans youth off of their prescribed hormone treatments, echoing concerns that medical professionals have shared with LAist.

Sponsored message

“Even brief interruptions in gender-affirming medical care can have a detrimental impact on a patient’s mental health and overall well-being,” the lawsuit states.

Bonta also pointed to the short notice — just over two weeks — given to families, and said it left “hundreds of patients in medical limbo.”

The father of a trans patient at Rady Children’s Health told LAist he found out from the San Diego based nonprofit TransFamily Support Services that his son’s health care provider could no longer prescribe hormones. The father later found out that he'd been notified through a brief statement in a portal in his health care app, with no information about next steps. He said he was not otherwise contacted directly by the hospital.

Bonta’s office declined to comment further on the lawsuit.

What the hospital system is saying

In a statement to LAist, Rady Children’s Health said it is “aware of the lawsuit filed by the California Attorney General and is reviewing the filing.” It did not clarify if it planned to go forward with previously announced restrictions.

“That decision was guided by our responsibilities as a nonprofit pediatric healthcare system to continue serving all children and families across our communities, including through participation in essential federal programs,” Rady Children’s Health wrote.

Sponsored message

The hospital system said that it will address Bonta’s concerns “through the legal process.” It did not respond when LAist asked directly if this meant it was undoing its previously announced restrictions.

The hospital has pointed to recent federal actions, which include proposals aimed at restricting gender-affirming care for youth, as the reasoning behind its move. The federal HHS rule changes are still going through a required 60-day comment period, which will end on February 17. The rules, even if they’re upheld by courts, may not take effect until later in the spring.

What advocates for trans health are saying

“They are clearly in violation of their contract. They're clearly in violation of the law,” Kathie Moehlig, founder and executive director of TransFamily Support Services, said. “We didn't see any action happen around [CHLA’s trans youth clinic] when it closed, other than a letter from the Attorney General, but actually taking a legal stance is good. Somebody’s standing up for our families.”

Moehlig also pointed to the “slow drip” of actions taken by Rady Children’s Health to restrict access to its gender-affirming health care services, and noted that the state Attorney General’s office appears not to have been notified about any of them.

TransFamily Support Services regularly works to connect families seeking gender-affirming health services with providers, including at CHOC and other Rady’s Health hospitals.

Moehlig also familiar with the health care system for another reason: Her son was the first patient treated at Rady Children’s Hospital’s gender-affirming care clinic in San Diego 14 years ago, well before the care began to become restricted in Republican-led states and nationally.

Sponsored message

The rare move from Bonta follows protests and blowback from the community in Southern California, as protests were held outside CHOC and Rady’s Children Hospital in San Diego.

What this means

Bonta’s lawsuit marks a new enforcement mechanism in the state’s tactics to protect gender-affirming care for youth.

Up to this point, Bonta has not directly intervened with hospitals in closures and restrictions for trans youth health care through lawsuits, opting instead to send hospitals letters warning them of potential legal action.

Many of the legal issues around gender-affirming care for youth, and whether the federal government's actions to restrict it are legal, have still yet to be settled. There are multiple ongoing and expected lawsuits to settle the issue of whether the federal HHS can act to restrict trans youth health care by outlawing the allocation of Medicare and Medicaid funds for healthcare providers that offer it.

Many advocates have accused the federal government of overreach and using improper enforcement mechanisms to strong-arm hospitals into closing or limiting access to clinics for trans youth.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today