With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Half the National Guard troops sent to LA in response to ICE-related protests will be released

Topline:
Half the 4,000 National Guard troops that were sent to L.A. in response to protests against immigration enforcement will be released from duty, the Pentagon announced Tuesday.
Background: Last month, the Trump administration deployed 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, and 700 Marines in response to the immigration enforcement protests. The Trump administration said the deployment was necessary to protect federal agents and buildings.
State and local officials say: Gov. Gavin Newsom has spoken out against the deployment, calling it a political move by the president. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass has also said that the military presence in the city felt “provocative.”
Federal officials say: “Thanks to our troops who stepped up to answer the call, the lawlessness in Los Angeles is subsiding,” Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement. However, local officials, journalists, and other witnesses have said protests have been mostly peaceful since they started early last month in response to the immigration activity.
Local response: In a statement, Bass said the troops were being released "because the people of Los Angeles stood united and stood strong. We organized peaceful protests, we came together at rallies, we took the Trump administration to court — all of this led to today’s retreat. My message today to Angelenos is clear — I will never stop fighting for this city. We will not stop making our voices heard until this ends, not just here in L.A., but throughout our country.”
What’s next: California has sued the Trump administration over whether it was legal to deploy federal troops. In their lawsuit, the governor and Attorney General Rob Bonta argue the move violated the limits on federal power. The ongoing case is still being worked out after a federal appeals court ruled that the president can keep control over the National Guard in L.A.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.
-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.
-
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.