Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Warrior, MMA and the Existential Crisis

warrior.jpg
Tommy (Tom Hardy, left) and Paddy (Nick Nolte, right) in WARRIOR. Photo credit: Chuck Zlotnick/used with permission

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

It’s been a long time since a movie has caused so much of an existential crisis within me. I think the last time that happened was with The Matrix 2, and the crisis was actually the bruising of what little intellect I had due to the absolute inanity-laden philosophical assault it took. But with Warrior, I really had to wonder if I am just a contrarian just for the sake of it.

Tom Hardy plays Tommy, an AWOL marine (sound familiar Bloodsport?), who reunites with his father Paddy (Nick Nolte) after 14 years to train for the $5 million SPARTA tournament. Tommy has a brother Brendan (Joel Edgerton) who is a physics teacher by day and, so he won’t lose his house because of the economy, a fighter by night. The SPARTA tournament is for the top 16 middleweight fighters, but miraculously both Tommy and Brendan are allowed in the field.

Paddy is a recovered alcoholic which is why Tommy and his mother left him. But Brendan stayed with Paddy because of a girl (now his wife) and because with Tommy gone Brendan might get some love from his father. Now sober, Paddy loves listening to Moby Dick on tape.

What I really didn’t understand is why a lot of people loved it. In the screening I attended, there were people cheering and laughing at the trite one-liners. The only part I found amusing was when I realized how much of Bring It On was in this film and thinking that perhaps Kirsten Dunst and Eliza Dushku could have saved the film. But with almost everyone in the theater cheering, it really got me thinking if I was just a rebel without a cause.

Then it got me thinking that maybe Lionsgate planted those people in the audience so they could possibly sway the opinions of anyone there who was going to review the film. But since I’m a pressbox veteran where cheering is strictly forbidden, I am impervious to this form of brainwashing. It set off a cycle where I have been reexamining every facet of my life for the past few days and wonder if I truly like what I like or am I influenced by my hypothetical contrarian nature.

Nonetheless, all of this internal turmoil didn’t detract from the fact that I didn’t like this film. It took itself too seriously when it was a derivative of many other films: the Kumite of Bloodsport; the media portrayal of Bring It On; the family problems of The Fighter or The Wrestler or whatever other fighting movie there is. It even started out with a jangly acoustic guitar lick backing up a Bob Dylan wannabe to tell the audience the film has depth.

Just so I’m not a complete Negative Nancy, the initial rounds of the SPARTA tournament was actually breathtaking (sans the ESPN announcers Bryan Callen and Sam Sheridan and their awful attempts at humor.) Cinematographer Masanobu Takayanagi saved the film with those scenes.

Sponsored message

Perhaps the film was deep enough for people with bad tattoos who have a steady stream of Ed Hardy or Affliction t-shirts in their wardrobe since there was plenty of that to go around in the film. Perhaps I’m just being a pretentious contrarian. Perhaps I just wanted more from this film.

Dir: Gavin O’Connor. US. 2011. 139mins. Opens Sep. 9.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today